RE: GOAWAY clarification

Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Mon, 23 March 2015 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3B31AD35B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RpTL2gY0Hinx for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90D9B1AD369 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Ya7Vj-00027y-Vk for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:55:40 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:55:39 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Ya7Vj-00027y-Vk@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1Ya7VY-00024j-47 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:55:28 +0000
Received: from mail-by2on0112.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.100.112] helo=na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1Ya7VX-0004jv-5B for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:55:28 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.24) by BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.106.15; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:54:55 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.219]) by BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.219]) with mapi id 15.01.0106.007; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:54:55 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: GOAWAY clarification
Thread-Index: AQHQY5wfkvt3vKPqPUOEnwLouuqUqJ0mhY2AgACdY4CAAKVMgIAA4IuAgAAH2ICAAIJKUIAAOGCAgAC6/oCAAEbioA==
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:54:54 +0000
Message-ID: <BL2PR03MB1324293E5BCA0078B0D1E1A870D0@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABkgnnWrZpNjLnQ2mn0YnoU-e1oArWVDmBTqiX=cDAeeA+ZZ+Q@mail.gmail.com> <550D19DB.80306@treenet.co.nz> <CABkgnnXg1uV9AP-fgsMzRyY_71ke31sYYknV+TYbJhiEf1qY0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUoVZkj6+8cVapJ9gp_OPDgkD_FzrUspK8jJu=vkhV-rA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWz87Rwrhdc-2N+v+3=uskwavn7QhxZHAZPaAscTRg7xw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWQaFMnA9AR5v1n6s+x0=UdhRu2j9KmiQoOjhvgQNkvzA@mail.gmail.com> <BL2PR03MB132B91A7F384565D035234B870D0@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnWgmQiAs_os4uAvLFU0H1824QjchKYPYYGrOMGxb9WLsA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW-PXjxt8n7k+4LxOqEXmK+ab-v3V617-4Gn3+t3Hhy9g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW-PXjxt8n7k+4LxOqEXmK+ab-v3V617-4Gn3+t3Hhy9g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e0:ed43::3]
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2PR03MB132;
x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(51444003)(24454002)(13464003)(92566002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(74316001)(122556002)(2656002)(86612001)(33656002)(40100003)(99286002)(93886004)(106116001)(77156002)(62966003)(221733001)(2950100001)(87936001)(2900100001)(110136001)(86362001)(50986999)(46102003)(76576001)(54356999)(15975445007)(102836002)(76176999)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR03MB132; H:BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BL2PR03MB132C6513439E681D92659C6870D0@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5002010)(5005006); SRVR:BL2PR03MB132; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BL2PR03MB132;
x-forefront-prvs: 05245CA661
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Mar 2015 18:54:55.0050 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL2PR03MB132
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.46.100.112; envelope-from=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com; helo=na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.767, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_NOWL=1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Ya7VX-0004jv-5B ffed24e7ce1c6fcce93b27d368c08fe7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: GOAWAY clarification
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/BL2PR03MB1324293E5BCA0078B0D1E1A870D0@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29015
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

One inconsistency in the revised text:  You still say at line 2444 that initiating new requests "is inadvisable."  It's not just inadvisable, it's MUST NOT at line 2353.

I'll also note that the seamless hand-off is a perfect reason for the DRAINING frame extension that was also floated during that discussion -- DRAINING could be defined as a hint that the client should spin up a secondary connection because a GOAWAY is coming soon.  No harm if the client doesn't understand or obey it -- the loss is strictly its own.

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 7:36 AM
To: Mike Bishop
Cc: HTTP Working Group
Subject: Re: GOAWAY clarification

On 22 March 2015 at 20:27, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 March 2015 at 17:17, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> On the other hand, I'm still inclined to see MUST NOT create new streams as the intent of GOAWAY.

I've updated the PR.  I think that this is *purely* clarification now.
Please confirm that this is the case.

https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/733/files