IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Push and Caching

Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FD31A06A6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzW821yI6CVI for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3821A069F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XM6ob-0008UG-2A for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 02:48:57 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 02:48:57 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XM6ob-0008UG-2A@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gregw@intalio.com>) id 1XM6oL-0008TH-43 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 02:48:41 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gregw@intalio.com>) id 1XM6oJ-0007ki-SS for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 02:48:41 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id d1so3460598wiv.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9AgW+6Jwc9j8NFizMnt02/S28y+7RgDZEmEslrSToJw=; b=YXv/TW9/i0Dm06c7YQlo0qrXoFmvKpuSPx60wJY+FUyh/UXwj2k3FoIayoU86Kkx5H nYDtUNaJAxPuJ+Ta4u59hwiSlEjGTfPfPgJv3esUIDOzpYpAYgmAU7rdnBoqIuSlFW03 UlUssSXtUHw90L0s1t/FtxOTfvw8DKgfHr5MbBxaAMiBM4zaucbs3h2rsuSg2zVzi+eU NMb0bbPTwQARZW+IxotzQSYKKJjD/bf5yqtrNB/bUq0+rlKZ+Qx76GCuJFixU7kcZbPb VV9offaJzLzPXUiFr6Uy7/fG9ieDh5AA9dSGmBpIRuEWD8yAeO+8ztn5NK04yXAhSBlh rEdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkHGkOyMFCpCQdeyMq2Kk5UgMHvXWHXcUfpIqWSSbz+CX1E6MgAFc8X7ac9ISo4gX77aUF0
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.89.200 with SMTP id bq8mr26850986wjb.52.1409021292896; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.169.98 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW9Uq5R1KvuTXuT=xUdX_pVWikyAOMp=ixJe+c0NRs4Lg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <dc3d860ecb4b4d408a5ed0519a036e61@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnWvKgyDcm-1jEKZUA2Qza9M46X+X_QybwuqRwvSUrTjNw@mail.gmail.com> <B6B89855-237F-44DA-B29C-2A3BB5CE0EED@mnot.net> <920b92b90a3c47ef8d450c903b83af40@DM2PR05MB670.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <d94a3acceb954583a61b0118381df417@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOdDvNpa5WR4LJbsgQaBE3bTSAc+gXfYqCmV+zmUzE5b7+1a9A@mail.gmail.com> <CECA0C1A-E64C-443A-87AF-22BC66286F72@mnot.net> <CABkgnnXVJA3R4qhc__k4j+_LzeS7B24VxfCZwBSfywepEx=tKA@mail.gmail.com> <40d03e3bb1df480e808e64fa29048880@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnX-0X+JZfFYhm18b=bLidaq_pqN5s-K0NBS28m-s6+9Kg@mail.gmail.com> <233C8C21-BF80-4E07-9717-56630085E192@mnot.net> <CABkgnnW9Uq5R1KvuTXuT=xUdX_pVWikyAOMp=ixJe+c0NRs4Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:48:12 +1000
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NHV_966DSX4yX-=tfDPUkk-obCXFbJnPifQpFb1KFjYDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, William Chow <wchow@mobolize.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0102eeaea4ff8905017f5527"
Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=209.85.212.174; envelope-from=gregw@intalio.com; helo=mail-wi0-f174.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.085, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XM6oJ-0007ki-SS a3cd7f0fbc24a2ff380fb91bf082d344
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Push and Caching
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAH_y2NHV_966DSX4yX-=tfDPUkk-obCXFbJnPifQpFb1KFjYDg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26735
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 26 August 2014 09:13, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> TAKE TWO:
> Pushed responses are considered successfully validated on the origin
> server (...) at the time that the response is generated.
>

I'm good with this one.     I like the instantaneous nature of it.

Any attempt to define the ongoing validity of a resource implies that
something will be checking that on the server side and overlaps with the
cache control headers.

cheers

-- 
Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status