Weekly github digest (HTTP Working Group Specifications)

Github Notifications <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 14 July 2019 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A4C120071 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 17:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=YEM5371M; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=UTilPrgu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A7XLZnBXr0tY for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 17:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41739120025 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 17:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1hmSeJ-0008Fs-QF for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 00:45:55 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 00:45:55 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1hmSeJ-0008Fs-QF@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <do_not_reply@mnot.net>) id 1hmSeH-0008F2-LR for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 00:45:53 +0000
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <do_not_reply@mnot.net>) id 1hmSeF-0005oT-Lc for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 00:45:53 +0000
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8387B2D2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 20:45:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 13 Jul 2019 20:45:28 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm3; bh=SDyYyxFWNHb58DujVYESGfPcWGyk7WK2UTuCm9TRmXU=; b=YEM5371M BSQZAlsyuTxxWwWPtPmXdZKt5ZLNb5DPx/Us72xPW74iQsIFmAqlf7CdK8hMbsoY oY4X2hXc9hnLwHi8JbtHp4a/7yM/ViSROrIxdWu5Mg4pTX0uCAIPtetuZqJv4Jpg jwLjPcf6Rcjn1GuVVp6g7I1O5sgBv9JzgQ6myQTuGUzn8DfFeurU1Ee4DXRlm9Qy XW8+d91oIEPece2WWBZET0A+CKEjrZI6FsLjU1pipB+vkPllcBNBj7klc73Lw/+/ mRxOEz7lbfoEw6dF4aksJnWI0mz6cm7ON7lmRdRXH2cV9Kerpy4EXJwrkQwjkZ3S MXwVVO4DeIBL3g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=SDyYyxFWNHb58DujVYESGfPcWGyk7 WK2UTuCm9TRmXU=; b=UTilPrgu4ttKZNjXbNdqmJ+0QeyIQa56b1mSsGv5sgKCO RWktyQG76sAwjmAsYpVRIAhROIUgCYaKynIXJjQXxG9AbTT07v5hObkqz1Um9vnj +Vk3lqHmFAKV+P5jZyXyErPnNyNz8DGBTACF07RSX+JaAn/aSR9bwXPHAGg63wWy qb0v3jClMJYe4FGTKYgjph6b2wqGi+N1PvAfN7o+9K/P9jPQ6orXW3HXAHIT454V WUtPXmaTiqCLj8m72MSwunLL/efmdY9xrMBsIsoRrzot8Epe2VKphpRsvtrAIuW4 1W8DvejJMpRQNlqJQfW6BpBeIM7p1SWP79loy1ong==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:J3sqXXhGSjCqZjB8HURfRo6_A0fz-rBBnpDL2-_ryqMdCxX8nVV6bw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrheeggddvfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenuc fhrhhomhepifhithhhuhgspgfpohhtihhfihgtrghtihhonhhsuceoughopghnohhtpghr vghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenuc fkphepudduledrledrgeefrddvgedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguohgp nhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepud
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:J3sqXSJ7gfV89JUj6luvvbHE-3RhaT512znIX7wKQW3qPsGiG1l4BQ> <xmx:J3sqXRpREZRJC8fmffaO-zKcwOIHwSnzNj8jBTNv0eukyybEVcSEQA> <xmx:J3sqXYz62HOLeIBsfMPG3W7q49-d3xVQZrY93LE2UpYG1d_YWpZLoQ> <xmx:KHsqXQV6IV9XbnMZan60kODm5PDka0SgcMiGZ9GHCt005B8RW0tQiQ>
Received: from cloud.mnot.net (cloud.mnot.net [119.9.43.241]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EC1FD8005A for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 20:45:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cloud.mnot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cloud.mnot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3338FC03E5 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 00:45:24 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============4833842379609482068=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?utf-8?q?Github_Notifications?= <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20190714004524.3338FC03E5@cloud.mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 00:45:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.19; envelope-from=do_not_reply@mnot.net; helo=wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.149, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1hmSeF-0005oT-Lc f7284a2a5928a63ac17b23766fdbca6f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (HTTP Working Group Specifications)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20190714004524.3338FC03E5@cloud.mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36802
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* httpwg/http-extensions (+10/-1/💬26)
  10 issues created:
  - Shall we use sh-binary serialization for `id-sha` digest-algoritms? (by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/855 [digest-headers] 
  - Digest should use http-core or rfc 723x? (by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/854 [digest-headers] 
  - Investigate the use of Digest with PATCH (by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/853 [digest-headers] 
  - Create a threat model for `Digest` header. (by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/852 
  - Using Digest in signatures (by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/851 
  - Clarify digest-algorithm syntax with parameters. (by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/850 
  - Example of a Digest of empty representation (by ioggstream)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/849 
  - Serializing sh-float is hard (by bsdphk)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/848 [header-structure] 
  - Clarify why ABNF doesn't allow empty sh-dict and sh-list. (by mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/845 [header-structure] 
  - * in parameter names (by mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/844 

  7 issues received 26 new comments:
  - #844 * in parameter names (9 by reschke, evert, martinthomson, mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/844 [header-structure] 
  - #855 Shall we use sh-binary serialization for `id-sha` digest-algoritms? (7 by dlongley, martinthomson, ioggstream, LPardue)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/855 [digest-headers] 
  - #853 Investigate the use of Digest with PATCH (5 by reschke, martinthomson, ioggstream, LPardue)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/853 [digest-headers] 
  - #842 Dictionary of a dictionary (2 by kazuho, mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/842 [header-structure] 
  - #839 Parameterised Lists -> Lists (1 by mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/839 [header-structure] 
  - #848 Serializing sh-float is hard (1 by mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/848 [header-structure] 
  - #854 Digest should use http-core or rfc 723x? (1 by reschke)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/854 [digest-headers] 

  1 issues closed:
  - Parameterised Lists -> Lists https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/839 [header-structure] 

* httpwg/http-core (+1/-0/💬8)
  1 issues created:
  - Caching Security Considerations (by mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/233 [caching] 

  5 issues received 8 new comments:
  - #194 QUIC and https:// (3 by awwright, mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/194 [discuss] [semantics] 
  - #215 field-value value space (2 by annevk, mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/215 [discuss] [semantics] 
  - #32 Duplicate header resolution in H1 (1 by mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/32 [semantics] 
  - #99 Scope of Retry-After (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/99 [semantics] 
  - #180 Clarify multiple `authorization` header behaviour or concatenation method (1 by mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/180 [discuss] [semantics] 



Pull requests
-------------
* httpwg/http-extensions (+3/-3/💬0)
  3 pull requests submitted:
  - Make OPTIONAL violation report keys clearer (by freddieleeman)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/856 
  - digest: consistency "header" vs "header field" (by reschke)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/847 
  - digests: fix ref to Appendix B of RFC 7231 (by reschke)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/846 

  3 pull requests merged:
  - digests: fix ref to Appendix B of RFC 7231
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/846 
  - digest: consistency "header" vs "header field"
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/847 
  - Roughing in collapse of ParamList into List
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/841 

* httpwg/http-core (+0/-0/💬9)
  2 pull requests received 9 new comments:
  - #219 Clarify when trailers can be generated (8 by reschke, mnot)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/219 
  - #222 adjust requirements for retries (1 by reschke)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/222 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions
* https://github.com/httpwg/http-core