Re: [httpstreaming] [dispatch] Q-HTTP

I wish your FAQ were something a lot shorter so that it would give us the main points very quickly. You are welcome to join tomorrow's bof session on http streaming but I don't see these two topics particularly relevant to each other (at this stage).

-acbegen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dispatch-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of GARCIA ARANDA, JOSE JAVIER (JOSE
> JAVIER)
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 12:33 AM
> To: Qin Wu; dispatch@ietf.org
> Cc: httpstreaming
> Subject: Re: [dispatch] Q-HTTP
> 
> Hi Qin and all,
> 
> Now the Q-HTTP draft is accesible at
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-aranda-dispatch-qhttp-00.txt
> 
> In addition, i have attached in this email a FAQ document for easier understanding of the protocol. This document clarifies
> the philosophy and shows different alternatives for the implementation
> 
> Regards and thanks
> 
> - Jose javier
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Qin Wu [mailto:sunseawq@huawei.com]
> Enviado el: lunes, 08 de noviembre de 2010 15:35
> Para: GARCIA ARANDA, JOSE JAVIER (JOSE JAVIER); dispatch@ietf.org
> CC: httpstreaming
> Asunto: Re: [dispatch] Q-HTTP
> 
> Hi, Joes Javier:
> Your bring a quite interesting draft. We have a Bar BOF on HTTP streaming on Wednesday evening, Emenrald room, which
> aims at  building new area and working out appropriate working scope to offer more efficient transport and better QoE. One
> of key issues we are ready to address is QOE improvement. If you are interested, please join our discussion.
> Also you can track the following link for our meeting agenda, location and time:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/httpstreaming/current/maillist.html
> 
> Regards!
> -Qin
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "GARCIA ARANDA, JOSE JAVIER (JOSE JAVIER)" <jose_javier.garcia_aranda@alcatel-lucent.com>
> To: <dispatch@ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 4:14 PM
> Subject: [dispatch] Q-HTTP
> 
> 
> 
> Hi experts,
> 
> We are a group of researchers which have written a draft about QoS measurements & reactions. We believe the
> standardization of this topic could benefit internet community in the coming years, for example for virtualization of
> videogames through intenet. We would like to receive comments and some feedback and also oppinions about the target
> area, because we believe that the draft fits into Real-time App and infrastructure Area scope, but currently the draft is in
> "looking for an area" state
> 
>    The draft describes Q-HTTP (Quality HTTP) , which is an application level protocol based on HTTP and SDP associated to a
> new specific uri "httpq://..." intended for carrying out quality negotiation and quality measurement between two parties. The
> final goal of this
> process is to verify that a certain application which depends on bandwidth, latency, jitter parameters, will work under
> current network conditions. Our idea tackles the fact that real-time services (virtualization, on line gaming, video, voice)
> nowadays are increasing and that in an internet (or WAN) environment propagation conditions may change with time for our
> connection; what works for most applications may not work for real-time ones and they should have a standard way of
> negotiating and verifying their requirements. Q-HTTP also provides a mechanism of account/alerting when required
> constraints are not met after the measurement is carried out.
> 
>  Implementation details on the actions to be triggered upon reception/detection of QoS alerts exchanged by the protocol are
> out of scope of this draft, it is application dependant (e.g. increase quality, reduce bit-rate) or even network dependant (e.g.
> change connection's quality profile).
> 
> Comments? Thanks
> 
> - Jose Javier
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dispatch mailing list
> > dispatch@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
> >