Re: [httpstreaming] Current Status and Our Goal

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Fri, 08 October 2010 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242813A6860 for <httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 01:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.597, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZoEWRC-nyuU0 for <httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 01:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com (mgw-sa02.nokia.com [147.243.1.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC143A6866 for <httpstreaming@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 01:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o988Gf3m018810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:16:42 +0300
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-157--1019049800; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <B1C30D3B-6D5C-46B9-848D-3AE0C8B6058C@csperkins.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:16:35 +0300
Message-Id: <9690AB8A-315E-4730-ABD8-78F4BB3E4CB6@nokia.com>
References: <00df01cb5de2$2ac49730$4f548a0a@china.huawei.com> <AANLkTimB3-=zWGnT=uq9Qcb-N8Pq+-RR0WMN12BZ9pr4@mail.gmail.com> <03f501cb65a1$50699d70$f13cd850$%roni@huawei.com> <B1C30D3B-6D5C-46B9-848D-3AE0C8B6058C@csperkins.org>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.fit.nokia.com); Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:16:35 +0300 (EEST)
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: "httpstreaming@ietf.org" <httpstreaming@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [httpstreaming] Current Status and Our Goal
X-BeenThere: httpstreaming@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network based HTTP Streaming discussion list <httpstreaming.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpstreaming>, <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/httpstreaming>
List-Post: <mailto:httpstreaming@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpstreaming>, <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:16:04 -0000

On 2010-10-7, at 14:16, Colin Perkins wrote:
> There are clearly some issues to consider here. What seems to be  
> missing from the discussion to me though, is some identification of  
> the concrete problems. What protocol pieces do we need, but not have?  
> What protocols are problematic, and need enhancement? Is there  
> protocol work to do in IETF, or should we be documenting best current  
> practices for using the existing protocols and/or relying on other  
> bodies to fill the gaps?
> 
> The draft-wu-http-streaming-optimization-ps is a good start at such an  
> analysis, but doesn't go deep enough to let us decide what work IETF  
> should do.

+1 

The key question really is "what do you think the IETF needs to do?"

Lars