Re: [httpstreaming] [dispatch] [conex] Q-HTTP

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Fri, 12 November 2010 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0533228C0EF; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:06:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.763
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.763 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.236, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EWJAsrVl+0sk; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:06:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244EA3A63EB; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:06:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:06:58 -0500
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:06:58 -0500
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: "GARCIA ARANDA, JOSE JAVIER (JOSE JAVIER)" <jose_javier.garcia_aranda@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:06:55 -0500
Thread-Topic: [dispatch] [conex] [httpstreaming] Q-HTTP
Thread-Index: AcuB/YVGBN3wWySoRYK2ksPukCUhdA==
Message-ID: <F4492D45-4141-4B10-B66C-FDBB321738C8@acmepacket.com>
References: <3349FECF788C984BB34176D70A51782F106701E2@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <1104E0EB-CBAD-4001-962F-9D5F8B856D42@nokia.com> <01d801cb8083$8ca250f0$a5e6f2d0$@iridescentnetworks.com> <1E1ED4EA-7CB5-4A86-BD3F-B1F5F72EF456@netflix.com> <C4064AF1C9EC1F40868C033DB94958C7031F0C1F@XMB-RCD-111.cisco.com> <EF84DC37-8CB6-4DB7-85AC-E091D90FF075@apple.com> <C4064AF1C9EC1F40868C033DB94958C7031F0CA2@XMB-RCD-111.cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011102303170.2639@uplift.swm.pp.se> <C4064AF1C9EC1F40868C033DB94958C7031F10D0@XMB-RCD-111.cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011111616310.2639@uplift.swm.pp.se> <C4064AF1C9EC1F40868C033DB94958C7031F1154@XMB-RCD-111.cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011111806430.2639@uplift.swm.pp.se> <3349FECF788C984BB34176D70A51782F16877F3C@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011111957580.2639@uplift.swm.pp.se> <3349FECF788C984BB34176D70A51782F16877F68@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011112134270.2639@uplift.swm.pp.se> <3349FECF788C984BB34176D70A51782F16877F9C@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <3349FECF788C984BB34176D70A51782F16877F9C@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:29:25 -0800
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, httpstreaming <httpstreaming@ietf.org>, "conex@ietf.org" <conex@ietf.org>, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>, "DIAZ VIZCAINO, LUIS MIGUEL \(LUIS MIGUEL\)" <luismi.diaz@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: [httpstreaming] [dispatch] [conex] Q-HTTP
X-BeenThere: httpstreaming@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network based HTTP Streaming discussion list <httpstreaming.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpstreaming>, <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/httpstreaming>
List-Post: <mailto:httpstreaming@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpstreaming>, <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:06:32 -0000

Hi,
one of the mailing lists you're CC'ing in this email thread is the DISPATCH WG list.  The purpose of the DISPATCH WG is to determine if and where to dispatch new work in RAI.  My guess is that even if there were agreement that there is a problem, and to solve the problem this way... this I-D would require a new WG, possibly not in RAI.  

Do the authors of this I-D plan to submit a proposed charter for a new WG into this Dispatch mailing list?

If not, I don't mean to be rude, but do you have to keep cc'ing the Dispatch mailing list? Don't you already have a mailing list dedicated for this discussion?  

And if you do plan to submit a charter, please email a proposed charter.

Don't take this as criticism, but Debating service provider OPEX, CAPEX, consumer market forces, and network design theory isn't really useful on the Dispatch mailing list.  We're just not the right group for that, methinks.  
Just my personal opinion.  To each his own.

-hadriel