Re: [httpstreaming] [conex] [dispatch] Q-HTTP

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 10 November 2010 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8941D3A63CB; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:08:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id onQ7sUdQXZWA; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823E13A6358; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 722079C; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:08:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6859A; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:08:25 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:08:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Mike Hammer (hmmr)" <hmmr@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4064AF1C9EC1F40868C033DB94958C7031F0CA2@XMB-RCD-111.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011102303170.2639@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <3349FECF788C984BB34176D70A51782F106701E2@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <6750274E2CC345C18EDE9FDDD59F24FA@china.huawei.com> <3349FECF788C984BB34176D70A51782F1067054D@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <DBB1DC060375D147AC43F310AD987DCC180E504600@ESESSCMS0366.eemea.ericsson.se> <3349FECF788C984BB34176D70A51782F168772C1@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <EAA2CFBF-9434-4E52-A586-7AE5F665A9DF@apple.com> <1104E0EB-CBAD-4001-962F-9D5F8B856D42@nokia.com> <01d801cb8083$8ca250f0$a5e6f2d0$@iridescentnetworks.com> <1E1ED4EA-7CB5-4A86-BD3F-B1F5F72EF456@netflix.com> <C4064AF1C9EC1F40868C033DB94958C7031F0C1F@XMB-RCD-111.cisco.com> <EF84DC37-8CB6-4DB7-85AC-E091D90FF075@apple.com> <C4064AF1C9EC1F40868C033DB94958C7031F0CA2@XMB-RCD-111.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:29:25 -0800
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org, httpstreaming <httpstreaming@ietf.org>, conex@ietf.org, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>, "GARCIA ARANDA, JOSEJAVIER \(JOSE JAVIER\)" <jose_javier.garcia_aranda@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: [httpstreaming] [conex] [dispatch] Q-HTTP
X-BeenThere: httpstreaming@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network based HTTP Streaming discussion list <httpstreaming.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpstreaming>, <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/httpstreaming>
List-Post: <mailto:httpstreaming@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpstreaming>, <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:08:00 -0000

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Mike Hammer (hmmr) wrote:

> 3) The people that build and operate the networks will double 
> (quadruple?) their investments for no additional return out of the 
> goodness of their hearts.

No, they're going to do it because if they don't give the customers what 
they promised, their customers are going to leave. This is if there is a 
functional market and customers actually have a choice of providers. I 
realise this is not the case in parts of the world, but that doesn't mean 
we should solve that by technical means, that's a political and regulatory 
problem, it doesn't have any technical solution.

Let's not forget that if you're congesting your core and distribution, 
you're not delivering what your customers have purchased. Period.

Everything else is just smoke and mirrors.

Congestion is acceptable on the customer access, it's not acceptable in 
the core. That means that any flows/pakets that should yield, are within a 
single customer domain, and thus in the customers own interest.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se