Re: [httpstreaming] Current Status and Our Goal

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Thu, 07 October 2010 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFAB3A6EB3 for <httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FcBudWVuW-fO for <httpstreaming@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3980D3A6D97 for <httpstreaming@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAGexrEyrR7H+/2dsb2JhbACiUXGpc5wuhUcEhFGIdw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,294,1283731200"; d="scan'208";a="600270514"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2010 00:29:16 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o970TGeL019390; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 00:29:16 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.169]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:29:16 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:28:02 -0700
Message-ID: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540D5BEB86@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C968BE22-93C9-4BB1-AB93-15AE1D861A8F@iridescentnetworks.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [httpstreaming] Current Status and Our Goal
Thread-Index: ActlsP/zDuFljiezTF+wIMUWJXZmnAABLBig
References: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540B8AA1A4@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com> <C968BE22-93C9-4BB1-AB93-15AE1D861A8F@iridescentnetworks.com>
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: Kathy McEwen <kathy@iridescentnetworks.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2010 00:29:16.0425 (UTC) FILETIME=[AC976F90:01CB65B6]
Cc: httpstreaming@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [httpstreaming] Current Status and Our Goal
X-BeenThere: httpstreaming@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network based HTTP Streaming discussion list <httpstreaming.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpstreaming>, <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/httpstreaming>
List-Post: <mailto:httpstreaming@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpstreaming>, <mailto:httpstreaming-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:28:16 -0000

> > Sure but preparing that content for multicast does not happen right away. If you want adaptive streaming style delivery
> over the web, you will incur delays. And there is wrong with that.

Sorry for the missing word. I meant there is *nothing* wrong with that.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathy McEwen [mailto:kathy@iridescentnetworks.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 7:48 AM
> To: Ali C. Begen (abegen)
> Cc: <Even.roni@huawei.com>; <dbryan@ethernot.org>; <sunseawq@huawei.com>; <httpstreaming@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [httpstreaming] Current Status and Our Goal
> 
> There are ways to reduce and eliminate the delays to set up the multicast as well.  Adaptive streaming over the web does not
> preclude improvements to multicast efficiencies.  Rather, a co operative implementation of adaptive streaming and highly
> efficient multicasting is perhaps the needed secret sauce... To be made not so secret thru open industry standardization.

Oh well, I don't disagree with the above except the fact that some things are meant to stay as secret sauce. Furthermore, viewers are becoming more and more non-live content consumers even for the live events (for different reasons).

-acbegen
 
> .../Kathy