[Hubmib] Regarding a doubt an EFMOAM

deepa ramar <login2deepa@gmail.com> Tue, 22 November 2011 11:11 UTC

Return-Path: <login2deepa@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hubmib@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hubmib@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299D221F8D0C for <hubmib@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:11:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yry3IQ4R0UwU for <hubmib@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:11:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E07B21F8D08 for <hubmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:11:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eyg24 with SMTP id 24so34348eyg.31 for <hubmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:11:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4NukwYNMjf5i3bSPC59AXKGr9a6Sjg6NaiTJDjLUuQw=; b=doN2AGj4cb1Cfq/7KDehxCLgM1KlllH6whCgNtbNZ31I5WCuFGSNB5LXAE/j2r7Cyh WwjlXDQxSF36VMpoEKglk+q/pbnu5MrDAWbeknoIJD3bmINz5P1mB64Wtg3OFR/c7+2C ZVPum/UGPvwk7vMLut3zBT+H4+qRopiC1LQoA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.21.143 with SMTP id j15mr402915ebb.50.1321960281659; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:11:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.35.130 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:11:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:41:21 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFJxEzSic3mXTGk5318q2g5yz55vCprn1iRznjZhwQD0GZXe7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: deepa ramar <login2deepa@gmail.com>
To: hubmib@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151748e91cfeda1704b250dcc5
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:00:48 -0800
Subject: [Hubmib] Regarding a doubt an EFMOAM
X-BeenThere: hubmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ethernet Interfaces an Hub MIB WG <hubmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hubmib>, <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hubmib>
List-Post: <mailto:hubmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib>, <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:11:23 -0000

Hi,

This is regarding a doubt w.r.t EFMOAM implementation in device.

Is Device needed more than one port to support OAM ?
In which scenario it is true ?

Because One port is enough to monitor the health of the link between
customer end and service provider end.

Regards,
Dheepa P R