Re: [Hubmib] FW: [802.3.1_MIBS] FW: 802.3.1-2011 Approval Notification

"Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Sun, 17 July 2011 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: hubmib@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hubmib@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA1221F85B8 for <hubmib@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lPzPpPLQl2Xq for <hubmib@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 13:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postgirl.ripe.net (postgirl.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1342]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3CE21F85B5 for <hubmib@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dodo.ripe.net ([193.0.23.4]) by postgirl.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1QiXsc-00033I-Ev; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:24:00 +0200
Received: from dog.ripe.net ([193.0.1.217] helo=BWMACBOOK.local) by dodo.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1QiXsb-0006y4-Iq; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:23:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4E2344DD.1040804@bwijnen.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:23:57 +0200
From: "Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A040324FD8E@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107160801120.20498@shell4.bayarea.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107160801120.20498@shell4.bayarea.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: -
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -1.0 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.0880]
X-RIPE-Signature: 86ab03e524994f79ca2c75a176445dd4da6ab4174e367aa858ebce3e319b22d4
Cc: "Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Hubmib <hubmib@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hubmib] FW: [802.3.1_MIBS] FW: 802.3.1-2011 Approval Notification
X-BeenThere: hubmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ethernet Interfaces an Hub MIB WG <hubmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hubmib>, <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hubmib>
List-Post: <mailto:hubmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib>, <mailto:hubmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:24:09 -0000

On 7/16/11 5:24 PM, C. M. Heard wrote:
> Dan,
>
> This new IEEE standard was published on July 1, 2011.  Since it
> includes updated versions of the MIB modules defined in RFC 2108,
> RFC 3621, RFC 3635, RFC 3637, RFC 4836, RFC 4837, RFC 4878, and RFC
> 5066, a question arises: would it be appropriate for the meta-data
> for these RFCs to indicate that they are obsoleted by IEEE Std
> 802.3.1?

Not sure if the RFC-editor can do or normally doies this. Dan, do you know.

If not, I guess we could write 1-2 page RFC that obsoletes the listed RFCs with a
pointer to the IEEE document.

Bert
>
> Mike Heard
>
> On Sun, 22 May 2011, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>> FYI.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Howard Frazier [mailto:hfrazier@BROADCOM.COM]
>> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 12:06 AM
>> To: STDS-802-3-MIB@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>> Subject: [802.3.1_MIBS] FW: 802.3.1-2011 Approval Notification
>>
>> Dear Members of the IEEE 802.3.1 Ethernet MIB modules Task Force,
>>
>> The initial version of P802.3.1/D3.1 Standard for Management Information Base (MIB) definitions for Ethernet has been approved as an IEEE standard. See below. Congratulations and thanks to all of you for your work on this project.
>>
>> A PAR for a revision of the standard is on the agenda for the June IEEE-SA Standards Board meeting.
>>
>> We will hold a short meeting next Thursday afternoon in conjunction with the IEEE 802.3 interim meetings in Incline Village, NV, to plan our work for the revision project.
>>
>> Howard Frazier
>> Chair, IEEE 802.3.1 Ethernet MIB modules Task Force
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Law, David [mailto:dlaw@hp.com]
>> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 12:05 PM
>> To: Howard Frazier
>> Subject: FW: 802.3.1-2011 Approval Notification
>>
>> Hi Howard,
>>
>> On checking I found that I did have the approval notification.
>>
>> Congratulations!!
>>
>> Best regards,
>>    David
>> _______________________________________
>>
>> From: k.evangelista@ieee.org [mailto:k.evangelista@ieee.org]
>> Sent: 17 May 2011 14:28
>> To: Law, David
>> Cc: p.nikolich@ieee.org; K.Bennett@ieee.org; k.breitfelder@ieee.org; thompson@ieee.org
>> Subject: 802.3.1-2011 Approval Notification
>>
>>
>> 17 May 2011
>>
>> David Law
>> HP Ltd.
>> 20 Clayknowes Ave
>> Musselburgh, East Lothian EH21 6UR
>> Scotland
>>   
>> cc:          Paul Nikolich, Sponsor Chair
>>          Kathryn Bennett, Program Manager
>>                Kim Breitfelder, Manager Standards Publishing
>>          Thomas Geoffrey, Negative Balloter
>>
>> RE: NEW P802.3.1/D3.1 (C/LM) Standard for Management Information Base (MIB) definitions for Ethernet
>> Dear David,
>>
>> I am pleased to inform you that P802.3.1 was approved as a new standard by the IEEE-SA Standards Board on 16 May 2011. A copy of the document will be forwarded to the Standards Publications Department. The editor assigned to work on the project will contact you.
>>
>> All IEEE standards shall be updated within five years of approval by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. If the standard is not revised, reaffirmed, or withdrawn within five years, the Sponsor will be notified that it will be submitted to the Standards Board for administrative withdrawal.  
>>
>> It should be noted that any negative balloters have the right to appeal. Please consult the following web pages for information on this process:
>>   
>> http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/
>>   
>> http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/
>>
>> Please contact me if you have any questions prior to speaking with your editor.  
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> ************************************************
>> Karen M. Evangelista
>> IEEE - SA Governance, Administrator
>> IEEE Standards Activities Department
>> 445 Hoes Lane
>> Piscataway, NJ 08854-4141 USA
>> TEL: +1 732 562 3854
>> FAX: +1 732 796 6966
>> k.evangelista@ieee.org
>> *************************************************
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hubmib mailing list
>> Hubmib@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib