Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts

"Pars Mutaf" <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 October 2007 16:13 UTC

Return-path: <humanresolvers-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Id6qv-0007sO-OA; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:13:37 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Id6qu-0007kO-Ol for humanresolvers@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:13:36 -0400
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.229]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Id6qo-0002TD-Hy for humanresolvers@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:13:36 -0400
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s8so3620401wxc for <humanresolvers@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=+fe5SwtJgC5Cflxw6/BCeMHR5QH32ENBITCYT688DrM=; b=JRZubXma36S8HB9ZDbHWDXcmtiPDTjCYFvIfkGcX2sJgM/WRODLFFImd8GRH3oOwy1VudUrlxblrEkXvpBztFL2ggxqD089vWRZpSVkeW+pavOFGKC3I5L/jySj5rZSZjSKYBH/BKz5mIqrZPbjEa+JfzbdxSMP7wuw+PKAo/cs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=AB7cGUAtxCvmOg/vY1vDDU87KWY1Za5WavmloGL6DQkbF8ASTJqFz0hB7OvP4o7qKNgGwY1La6ypbHNvzRLcCnEn+vRwtbziDCeJTc7cBA8O8QHgGiQvAbZRZtN+R0PPcnPTgsS/kKNQMScIoapvHnuopy+A45r5VP5UlpkIcKs=
Received: by 10.70.108.18 with SMTP id g18mr8562046wxc.1191427984847; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.22.4 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <18a603a60710030913q366402ecu7563ba8de474d39c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:13:04 +0200
From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
To: Virendra Gandhi <viren23@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <331b93fa0709262225y132903baydfa8ee7bc3babfd8@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <W2093714330205791190821079@webmail3> <331b93fa0709262225y132903baydfa8ee7bc3babfd8@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f66b12316365a3fe519e75911daf28a8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: IETF member Dave Aronson <ietf2dave@davearonson.com>, humanresolvers@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts
X-BeenThere: humanresolvers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pairing cellular hosts <humanresolvers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/humanresolvers>, <mailto:humanresolvers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/humanresolvers>
List-Post: <mailto:humanresolvers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:humanresolvers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/humanresolvers>, <mailto:humanresolvers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: humanresolvers-bounces@ietf.org

Hello,

I agree with you that a solution has two components:

1. naming and discovery of the target cell phone
2. pairing (the proposed solution)

Should we deal with naming in this mailing list?
Naming should be based on DNS? I'm not sure how
human names (especially colliding ones) are represented
in infrastructure DNS.

I know that multicast DNS can handle collisions.
It allows scanning a target name. One can scan
all John Smiths in range (in a large WiMax cell, or
WiFi network), choose the John Smith he is looking
for, and get paired with John Smith's cell phone.

But a multicast-based solution would be limited
to local scope.

Any thoughts from list members?

pars


On 9/27/07, Virendra Gandhi <viren23@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> True but thank god this is not the case here, cause if it was then
> imagine the problems for pairing cellular hosts, but that's neither
> here nor there. The point is Naming has to be in place (to my mind
> above all else) to enable a lot of things.
>
> Virendra Gandhi
>
>
> On 9/26/07, IETF member Dave Aronson <ietf2dave@davearonson.com> wrote:
> > Virendra Gandhi [mailto:viren23@gmail.com] writes:
> >
> >  > This is the classic John Smith problem,
> >
> > As an interesting (at least to me) side note:  The most common *given*
> name in the world is Mohammed.  The most common *family* name in the world
> is Chang.  This does *not* mean that Mohammed Chang is a common name....
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > --
> > Dave Aronson
> > "Specialization is for insects."  -Heinlein
> > Work: http://www.davearonson.com/
> > Play: http://www.davearonson.net/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> humanresolvers mailing list
> humanresolvers@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/humanresolvers
>
_______________________________________________
humanresolvers mailing list
humanresolvers@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/humanresolvers