[hybi] HyBi BOF announcement

Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Sat, 12 September 2009 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1321E3A687B; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.730, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PsMp9+mV+sKO; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FA43A6860; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b7b2cae000005a8f-73-4aab7ccd8acf
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0A.C9.23183.DCC7BAA4; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:49:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.174]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:49:48 +0200
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:49:48 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14642547; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:49:48 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BEF21A17; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:49:48 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB782195C; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:49:47 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4AAB7CCB.9010805@ericsson.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:49:47 +0300
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hybi@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, whatwg@whatwg.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2009 10:49:48.0762 (UTC) FILETIME=[BFB0B3A0:01CA3396]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [hybi] HyBi BOF announcement
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:49:13 -0000

Hi,
Peter Saint-Andre, Joe Hildebrand and I are organizing an HyBi BOF in 
Hiroshima.
If you would like to participate, please join the hybi@ietf.org 
<mailto:hybi@ietf.org> mailing list ( 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi ).
There is also a wiki page that will be update to keep all the 
information: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/HyBi

We are still working on the Charter Proposal and on the Agenda so all 
the proposal and comments are welcome!

The purpose of this BoF and eventual WG is to work on
"HTTP bidirectional" communication and both its improvement and 
evolution in new a protocol(s)

Here are the topics we are thinking to include in the charter proposal:

    *   Characterize and describe the design space for long-poll
      applications
    *   list the Requirements for new browser protocol
    *   New browser protocol. WebSockets as a possible starting point.
    *   at the same time, while waiting for new eventual protocol to be
      deployed,
        we envision the need to continue to improve the long-poll approach:
          o a suggested long-poll approach
          o how to improve or optimize middle-box (e.g. proxy)
            interoperability
          o Protocol bindings into the long-poll approach



best regards
Salvatore Loreto
www.sloreto.com