IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 27 October 2009 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1973A69E1 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.804
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.804 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.205, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eysyk8wmTUxS for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FC2B3A68DD for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2009 16:29:38 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.117]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp072) with SMTP; 27 Oct 2009 17:29:38 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18NDQR1+XUN8RP06vD+pyDw0gC4V9W0vTO+xuJBSk 8T3nrj4RqwEjfB
Message-ID: <4AE71FF1.6070009@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:29:37 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
References: <4ADEC7A0.7040307@ericsson.com> <4AE4CCBB.10001@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910260006420.9145@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AE553A0.9030208@ericsson.com> <73F5E810-F40F-42B8-81A9-4AD1306E360F@apple.com> <4AE57B62.4030209@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910270011060.13521@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AE6FC61.3070201@gmx.de> <op.u2gslzrk64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local>
In-Reply-To: <op.u2gslzrk64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.65
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] updated Charter proposal (WebSocket)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:29:26 -0000

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:57:53 +0100, Julian Reschke 
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> My understanding is that you want the protocol to be implemented by 
>> Web browsers, right? In which case the WG should make sure that those 
>> people actually intend to join the working group.
>>
>> Having a consensus-driven process that doesn't involve those who are 
>> supposed to implement the protocol would be a problem.
> 
> It seems representatives of all the "browser companies" are subscribed 
> to this list. My understanding from joining the HTTP WG was that this is 
> all it takes to be a member.

Yes, that is true.

What I meant is that these companies should *participate* in the WG, 
rather than sending feedback off-list to the editor.

BR, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email