Re: [hybi] Comments about draft-13

"Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com> Tue, 06 September 2011 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rbarnes@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD93121F8B6B for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqD9hDQpHyxs for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C60421F8B0D for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ros-dhcp192-1-51-76.bbn.com ([192.1.51.76]:61806) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.74 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <rbarnes@bbn.com>) id 1R0zvD-000LjK-2u; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:58:55 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfmS5KmooZ57+XWJtks2fHxw=8tCnm4oRMa2JtOM8DJR7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:58:54 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F54EFBF4-57D2-4425-AAB3-DB6DA5F8DB61@bbn.com>
References: <CALiegfkUMDfuRC+16ZcLo__2OqAcQ1UVDGa_610ykEAe6yZViw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=wO6w5UMLO-hsn8o0cX3__SuxMDrgqvScuS6QWdNhptw@mail.gmail.com> <A59BAA80-CD38-48C4-A113-C1493072D079@bbn.com> <CALiegfnru1MDVLZAQW9cxrR4D=Wfu+MAEzn0BHfSu_v31ztvrg@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnjXqggJhZG2YHSAQLK+uPXTxyKo3N=K4qE6OdjwieNtg@mail.gmail.com> <AADB2126-0259-4636-88D8-78D8B5E69EE6@bbn.com> <CALiegfmS5KmooZ57+XWJtks2fHxw=8tCnm4oRMa2JtOM8DJR7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?I=F1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Comments about draft-13
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:57:09 -0000

Correct.  So absent further restrictions in the API, a script could supply arbitrary UTF-8 data.  Thus, non "Sec".

--Richard


On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:

> 2011/9/6 Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>om>:
>> But the current WS API offers a much more direct channel to Websocket-Protocol, allowing the script to put in arbitrary strings.
> 
> But an "arbitraty string" could be a valid token so also a valid value
> for Sec-WebSocket-Protocol :)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>