IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Straw poll: Do you miss per-frame extension?

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Mon, 24 February 2014 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731841A07E7 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 03:03:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.762
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.762 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t90DJqqtsiJj for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 03:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4891A07E5 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 03:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id s1OB3NZN030533; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:03:23 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 2b50_271e_4772c222_9d43_11e3_a3cb_001e6722eec2; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:03:22 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [133.2.210.1]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B36BF4CD; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:03:23 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <530B26EF.4020106@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:03:11 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
References: <CAH9hSJa0XvzmS1MmmPmqKjQs0P8EUP8n=x+b0im1S2CO5wL1NA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJbQ9kWjtYCd6UM9hAGA=gr0oE7M5BVPtwJq1K8-95hAkQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH9hSJbQ9kWjtYCd6UM9hAGA=gr0oE7M5BVPtwJq1K8-95hAkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/1u6pr62PCQU06AV5xu5QsmsL_SA
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>, Peter Thorson <webmaster@zaphoyd.com>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Straw poll: Do you miss per-frame extension?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:03:33 -0000

On 2014/02/19 13:11, Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
> My answer is "no, I don't". I think we should drop per-frame extension
> capability. Even RFC 6455 should be updated to drop it when we get chance
> to do so.

This would be my answer, too.

Regards,   Martin.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email