IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Multiplexing extension spec draft 03

Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de> Tue, 28 February 2012 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FF321E8044 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:58:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yr1PKAp+u1lN for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:58:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXHUB020-3.exch020.serverdata.net (exhub020-3.exch020.serverdata.net [206.225.164.30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B8A21E8035 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:58:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net ([169.254.3.228]) by EXHUB020-3.exch020.serverdata.net ([206.225.164.30]) with mapi; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:58:42 -0800
From: Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de>
To: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:58:39 -0800
Thread-Topic: [hybi] Multiplexing extension spec draft 03
Thread-Index: Acz2U669iuteRcdxRnmMCwyoesCi6QAGGRBg
Message-ID: <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D42D5992F9C6@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net>
References: <CAH9hSJb1ewPO3EBgD78anD+=4XouToGR4X7C1wvWqonc2nYB6g@mail.gmail.com> <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D42D5992F76E@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> <CAH9hSJbd2MrqABaX+fme0MEpPSKtwJNtxyi_iz3RNnEx1a6Mvw@mail.gmail.com> <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D42D5992F87A@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> <CABLsOLDtXWa5oeQND3yMBmZWsfS36m5jMKzYYJp2iTN7fTEB6w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABLsOLDtXWa5oeQND3yMBmZWsfS36m5jMKzYYJp2iTN7fTEB6w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Multiplexing extension spec draft 03
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:58:44 -0000

>>I was wondering whether _outside_ of WS, there is a case with HTTP headers
>>where order is significant.
>
>Isn't Accept-Encoding/etc sensitive to the order (in the case of equal q values)?

Don't know for sure, but that would make sense. If so, then there is a wide-spread
"precedence case" for order significance in HTTP header. So I retract this point --

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email