Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 15 April 2010 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3763A28C1CA for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.053
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.454, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HwavNQyAMyEH for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F29FC3A69F3 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2010 19:21:56 -0000
Received: from p508FCE13.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.206.19] by mail.gmx.net (mp061) with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 21:21:56 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/l1q9FQ+blHikb4RuZ2M92eLsmdn5O8Kfn5joNvP FL3JLuWEsEuSdP
Message-ID: <4BC76724.5090307@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:21:08 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
References: <B578CFED7FE85644A170F4F7C9D52692019544C5@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se> <3d5f2a811003150230sdeb4f78hbdece96e5c742cfc@mail.gmail.com> <de17d48e1003180316w3dda1a3fo7db8b357925ec3f8@mail.gmail.com> <p2o3d5f2a811003310031x5dce7e9cs86a5a8981cd23c1d@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004140032040.875@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <w2y5821ea241004142323h949c0b07l771171500a625a6c@mail.gmail.com> <4BC6DD89.4060502@gmx.de> <r2x5821ea241004150244ud3cb79bt757049890bf3d9ab@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004151908320.23507@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004151908320.23507@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.66000000000000003
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:24:21 -0000

On 15.04.2010 21:10, Ian Hickson wrote:
> ...
> This has been the way Web Socket feedback has been handled for years
> before this working group was created, and over the years I've had
> multiple people tell me they prefer this model. However, I'm happy to do
> whatever the chairs want me to do.
> ...

It might have been a good thing while you used the WHATWG mailing list, 
where many many other topics are discussed as well.

But *this* mailing list is for the various Hybi specs, so IMHO the right 
(and common) way to handle things is to have one mailing list thread per 
topic, and, optimally, not to mix process questions with technical 
questions ;-)

I'm sure the chairs will correct me if they see this differently.

Best regards, Julian