IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Call for Consensus: draft-tyoshino-hybi-websocket-perframe-deflate as WG Item

John Tamplin <jat@google.com> Thu, 01 March 2012 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jat@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7362021E836D for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:26:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ohMw-O5qyWhz for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:26:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D675C21E809C for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:26:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so682003qcs.27 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:26:53 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jat@google.com designates 10.224.181.66 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.181.66;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jat@google.com designates 10.224.181.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jat@google.com; dkim=pass header.i=jat@google.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.181.66]) by 10.224.181.66 with SMTP id bx2mr5903361qab.68.1330640813495 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:26:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=/+LNjV+r5WnHL2zBo1nxOCd7GyxXDA66DWjBqh3WXIw=; b=XfNN8yMyMtuj6uTy1hIxTeDXo96BPljBTZtIv69cqzq4M2539GFGBwOr4CGoRJD3DC Lz+4upclVUsnRonaVCevn2lyPlzCv5C0bnYmjxopiMGNz7uKpAaUQ+GFlVkPNuuKY6ly VjxcMhyIFlfl8++6AMdmvX+6+ZvzkTmwy8bdaIYlq+H0rmr40oLPN0Lp+46mYiG3NfKN 8BZjPqnvrGRBXlX1CGNYkMORNPRudxikw9x7GQnaqDFScMJraAa2HTjxDZBupUFSIfvj QaHK6/05kHZzfBKf04VbZZfhgmBqyDFdzebx2xRZw7cKlu3ey2XXiVHIN8aX/Nt0s8iI 8iTw==
Received: by 10.224.181.66 with SMTP id bx2mr4931543qab.68.1330640813441; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:26:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.181.66 with SMTP id bx2mr4931538qab.68.1330640813335; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:26:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.103.149 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:26:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAH9hSJakzY8RAHgBgQbjGq4GvPJFdrtS8TXt_aUqjiwZCOZR-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4F4C8568.7070403@ericsson.com> <CAH_y2NF0mG9+PWotJmG0e4trgSxhOtaoGXLeeQUS1Tn5zpZuYQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJakzY8RAHgBgQbjGq4GvPJFdrtS8TXt_aUqjiwZCOZR-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:26:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CABLsOLAZe3d3BXWMEvTL-nHAMRzXJ_F-eSCUnjdsN99CTnL99g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf30334f9100a5ce04ba35f5d3"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmPU581vSIpMuglEUCk3LxOuR+bLDr+FN4kOrQGm66Jf38aLcopDwXZWPzjCzs00bPlz5UfV7801MiOjSWtQ9koiZEQv8e8Mw0FtVBAhD0e4Xgan7V81tsjrDdwmfKTeptGSHPW
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Call for Consensus: draft-tyoshino-hybi-websocket-perframe-deflate as WG Item
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:26:54 -0000

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> wrote:

> I also wonder if it's useful to make it able to negotiate whether to use
> compression bit or not on opening handshake.
>

Personally, I think that complicates things too much.  When we reserved the
bit, one of the things we were reserving it for was per-frame compression.

-- 
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email