Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (3215)
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 07 May 2012 00:58 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBBD21F84CF for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 May 2012 17:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.541
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.541 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id azTuJDVK+qGc for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 May 2012 17:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CAC21F84C8 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 May 2012 17:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (unknown [216.17.175.160]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C847E40058; Sun, 6 May 2012 19:13:40 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4FA71E33.3020608@stpeter.im>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 18:58:27 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hybi@ietf.org
References: <20120507003008.A70F2B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120507003008.A70F2B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ifette+ietf@google.com, Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com, jesse.katzman@gmail.com, presnick@qualcomm.com, barryleiba@computer.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (3215)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 00:58:30 -0000
IMHO this is not really a valid erratum, although it's a worthy topic for discussion if and when this working group (or a successor working group) decides to work on a document that might supersede RFC 6455. On 5/6/12 6:30 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6455, > "The WebSocket Protocol". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6455&eid=3215 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Jesse Katzman <jesse.katzman@gmail.com> > > Section: 5.3 > > Original Text > ------------- > The unpredictability of the masking key is essential to prevent authors of malicious applications from selecting the bytes that appear on the wire. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > > > Notes > ----- > I don't see how the client-to-server masking prevents "authors of malicious applications from selecting the bytes that appear on the wire". > > Maliciously changing the contents of a message simply requires a few more steps than it would without masking, as far as I can tell. > > I'm quite new at networking, so perhaps I'm missing something. Thank you. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6455 (draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-17) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The WebSocket Protocol > Publication Date : December 2011 > Author(s) : I. Fette, A. Melnikov > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : BiDirectional or Server-Initiated HTTP > Area : Applications > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ > hybi mailing list > hybi@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
- [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (3215) RFC Errata System
- Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (3… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (3… Barry Leiba
- Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (3… Jesse Katzman
- Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (3… John Tamplin
- Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (3… Jesse Katzman