IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Working over existing firewalls and proxies

Frank Salim <frank.salim@kaazing.com> Tue, 14 April 2009 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <frank.salim@kaazing.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469993A6DBB for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.376
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46DeEP1xlFlJ for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D523A6B2B for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l35so1387934waf.5 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.181.6 with SMTP id d6mr3969771waf.94.1239752993296; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <49E51506.1020500@webtide.com>
References: <49E3D363.8030803@mozilla.com> <49E3D937.5020009@webtide.com> <20090414153243.GD26621@shareable.org> <79ea848f0904141018j59659f21n82944f3723409991@mail.gmail.com> <49E51506.1020500@webtide.com>
From: Frank Salim <frank.salim@kaazing.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:49:38 -0700
Message-ID: <b7197f6c0904141649n6e5e9441pd54c1383ba698b9@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00163646d987c6540604678c7cbb"
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Working over existing firewalls and proxies
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:48:42 -0000

There is a patch for Firefox:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472529
-Frank

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote:

> Mario Balibrera wrote:
>
>> Currently, js.io <http://js.io> works that way with WebSocket. If there
>> is a native browser implementation available (none yet, obviousy)
>>
>
>
> I find it really strange that there are no browsers that currently
> implement Websocket.   It's been around for a while now and I've
> frequently asked if there is a browser that supports it - even
> a branch of one of the OS browsers.
>
> So far I've drawn a blank... and because the browsers are not
> implementing it, I've felt no great need to add it to my
> Jetty server.
>
> So there are some browser builders on this list - can any
> of them volunteer why there has been no experimentation with
> websocket?
>
> Anybody know why the websocket designers have not tested their
> proposal with an extension to firefox or similar?
>
>
> cheers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email