Re: [hybi] Review of draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-13

Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de> Tue, 06 September 2011 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820FE21F8C52; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ZT0R+PTu5Mc; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXHUB020-3.exch020.serverdata.net (exhub020-3.exch020.serverdata.net [206.225.164.30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E738021F8C1D; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net ([169.254.3.209]) by EXHUB020-3.exch020.serverdata.net ([206.225.164.30]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:01:28 -0700
From: Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de>
To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:00:25 -0700
Thread-Topic: AW: [hybi] Review of draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-13
Thread-Index: AcxstisW6EEVEVakThWyzjD2BH2I0wAAAj4w
Message-ID: <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D422C0EB8E4D@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net>
References: <942CCA6B-B784-441B-96CA-3506FFC439E1@bbn.com> <CALiegfmyQ5h4S2FgBnrh2VLr8+q-h0sLiGsww7T+1VwYNRo4wQ@mail.gmail.com> <72E40A0F-C923-472F-9534-538B89F7A444@bbn.com> <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D422C0EB8D18@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> <365A444D-CF7D-41A0-A446-7306DE4CDBBC@bbn.com> <c8ic67por9b7638k4cuoqr4blvneo2hlh3@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D422C0EB8E1A@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D422C0EB8E2B@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> <ABBB8204-4201-4201-8AF1-5BA2A40FB999@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <ABBB8204-4201-4201-8AF1-5BA2A40FB999@bbn.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Review of draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-13
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:59:42 -0000

> > for servers:
> >
> > client mask (4 octets)
> > last frame end % 4 : 2 Bits => to know where within mask to start for
> unmasking the next masked frame received
> 
> Server shouldn't need to remember this, since each fragmented frame
> comes with its own masking key.  At least that's how I read the spec; there's
> nothing in Section 5.4 that seems to indicate that masking keys get carried
> over from one fragment to another.

yep, you are right, sloppyness on my side. what I wanted to say:

"=> to know where within mask to start for unmasking the next _chunk of octets_ received"

it's only need with a WS implementation capable of full streaming, that
is i.e. processing frames of 2^63 length.