Re: [hybi] Masking only Payload/Extension Data

John Tamplin <jat@google.com> Thu, 10 March 2011 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jat@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBBA3A6942 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:51:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.828
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.828 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IyOoAPtzCzxp for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F041C3A68DC for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:51:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kpbe20.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe20.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.84]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p2AIr2Mh017204 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:53:03 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1299783183; bh=9hQkJebJn6EyJJMdeDuHQUJK7JQ=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=gzduK20BjgIrUc0y3In5Hw4vJ+MBBHDMH37rPaAquWPmNVL0I/reLZ3s1kQeLklbK tJwP/8UWljbOOQ0vFH0Ow==
Received: from gwb20 (gwb20.prod.google.com [10.200.2.20]) by kpbe20.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p2AIr1pF014633 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:53:01 -0800
Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so599655gwb.3 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:53:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=4QqhNjliEAtaYd0BkJu76CthimpH9KxzdfgsOMx3xEo=; b=G7P6GOPik+HQ0bhYIk2MuqIVktVoeuweTMa83o9DZvEWR9lq5V++6QgdQF9AF+85k5 Mb5MYKBqpAzKF7HwjWbw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=ntm0SZoqKuch9ua1HCZggclgsVVven1d/1Mjwf9+e4zLAf584l1hPXNwywRENsjkAK BEVUMjVEGsqKLlBcd2xA==
Received: by 10.151.157.9 with SMTP id j9mr1409738ybo.409.1299783181124; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:53:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.200.16 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:52:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik557Y=tvpA-CypTgrGpxJTtfscmFuGKi0YEt0d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D77B885.5050109@callenish.com> <OF36FEDDC6.06951577-ON8825784E.0062343E-8825784E.0066AC27@playstation.sony.com> <AANLkTinau4g1pB_ccJ31u7WRi5npYtHvXE5YRn5uTbeV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikB4YeaYiF_NVGn61c1YxpNWbmEWQZu1WcN+=Jf@mail.gmail.com> <1299704939.2606.238.camel@ds9.ducksong.com> <20110309214212.GA29190@1wt.eu> <AANLkTi=i=8aWg=6+T7=Kn5dWeKkW6MYVCH_CuNkt_ZMM@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimip9o0RoZaBfONCmg5nuJVWXjOKDKgAt8zrNVV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikbFBeM6+hiURSBqxFyjc2Wc-yh8UJnZiO+U0JX@mail.gmail.com> <4D7915FF.50300@callenish.com> <AANLkTik557Y=tvpA-CypTgrGpxJTtfscmFuGKi0YEt0d@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:52:41 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTikbObWcOzFZGrS=yWZqzVdpm6z4j2B+WfEbqQWX@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Endicott <dendicott@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001517510fdccbc3fd049e255a1b"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Masking only Payload/Extension Data
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:51:47 -0000

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:33 PM, David Endicott <dendicott@gmail.com> wrote:

> Count me in as +1 in favour of no masking.
>

We declared consensus long ago that we would require masking on
client->server.  Your points below are nothing that wasn't brought up before
that decision, so I don't see why we should revisit it.

This discussion is about whether to have the mask before or after the
opcode/length fields in the frame.

-- 
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google