IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] WebSocket feedback

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 05 March 2010 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2D13A901E for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:52:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61SzqeNXynwn for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:52:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CDDE3A901D for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Mar 2010 19:52:05 -0000
Received: from p508FD55D.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.213.93] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 05 Mar 2010 20:52:05 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Gw6ZoyNXGp2tpk4ehn5vLx34hha9tvUpNKjS0DG w0uyDzsI80mM6n
Message-ID: <4B9160D5.8020907@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:51:49 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
References: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F032E566DDF@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002150605580.29686@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4B8F6056.8060809@webtide.com> <CE4EF44A-6C8F-43BC-ABF4-777C1149A16F@d2dx.com> <4B8F72FA.2050908@webtide.com> <4B90D3B2.8070502@ninebynine.org> <4B915EA1.2030701@webtide.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B915EA1.2030701@webtide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.72999999999999998
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] WebSocket feedback
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:52:07 -0000

On 05.03.2010 20:42, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> Graham,
>
> it is my experience that GETs with bodies transit the internet without
> problem - which is as the spec says they should.
>
> But I agree that having a GET with a body can stretch the semantics
> of the method.  For this reason and for avoiding auto retries, I think
> POST would be a better method.
> ...

<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/19>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email