Re: [hybi] consensus call: websocketprotocol baseline

to clarify the process:

  the chairs are well aware from the observations raised during the 
meeting and after on the list
that there are in both the versions (75 and 76) of the draft several 
controversial areas
where text may (and indeed needs to) be improved, changed or removed.
The discussion has also indicated several issues that certainly need 
more discussion and
a more clear consensus.

Since we are now at a fresh start, whatever version will be chosen as 
baseline,
we will adopt a systematic approach at tracking issues on this document 
using the
IETF issue tracker tool.
(for an idea of how the tool works take a look at:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/query?component=p1-messaging)

Moreover the draft will be changed to reflect and respect the 
requirements that will
be gather through consensus in the requirement draft.

best regards
/Sal

-- 
Salvatore Loreto
www.sloreto.com

On 5/7/10 5:41 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 07.05.2010 16:30, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>    
>> Sal,
>>
>> As I'm sure you can guess, my preference is for 75 over 76,
>> because of the non HTTP compliant issues (not because
>> of breaking changes).
>>
>> However, I do recognize that there is also much goodness in
>> 76 that we don't really want to lose or even revisit.
>>
>> So I'd like to suggest a third alternative for consensus:
>> that Ian prepare a 77 draft, based on 76, but with the handshake
>> reverted to the 75 handshake.
>> ...
>>      
> +1
>
> That being said, the *much* more interesting question (to me at least)
> is how we manage the process once we have a Working Group draft.
>
> Best regards, Julian
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>    