IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] WS framing alternative

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 30 October 2009 05:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D08C3A695C for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.068, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AgpGO0740EvC for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EE53A6952 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.4.Beta0/8.14.4.Beta0) with ESMTP id n9U51Vxo016888 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1256878899; x=1256965299; bh=TcMKJEcezTzcStjf5/NvnruxrZiTyogNtUXwZ03dp74=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=VZsGDJi75JT/XpW9Adh4aJEQbfnJUhLsbnq9H49LSliIVeR/BCX2S/lhCCsMp2AHi mp14GYAv8zsrKRQwCGrFKrJamAhzb8gF3SgahZj/6tXYdrTs2DlcjvX6rdAB8AXP+0 6T+ezo0Hf1lDq7RvDyYp+Cks6BT5DEwsFH3NfSWI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=ifFLWZpSpeywBIOYCXNIEsh9weF7PqmbKNf8hdM7N7v7SRjPfVntzYh4dggx550Or iKbyak8o5ySzP6HwDmpaEFNDmwiVOLC6tIH4FEZDY/QuG3tfM029DBcx5ubSxRFI4L7 pa4KXSBdy9anyFDbE2tPrAGBZwiPQJR+pyX1COo=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20091029214250.028ec768@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:01:19 -0700
To: hybi@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910300346010.25616@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
References: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F0F1EA72C@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910270903080.9145@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <a9699fd20910270426u4aa508cepf557b362025ae5db@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910271824200.25616@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AE76137.8000603@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910272118590.25608@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <20091029123121.GA24268@almeida.jinsky.com> <4AEA0E6C.1060607@webtide.com> <4AEA5713.8020008@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910300346010.25616@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [hybi] WS framing alternative
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:01:34 -0000

At 21:22 29-10-2009, Ian Hickson wrote:
>What is the process for proceeding in the IETF when people have
>fundamentally different and mutually exclusive opinions?

The group seeks rough consensus.  I guess that you could think of it 
as the view that reconciles the various opinions.  That does not 
require everyone to agree; although that's better.  It's not a hard 
rule; there's no voting.  It's up to the Working Group Chair to 
evaluate the consensus.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email