Re: [hybi] IETF-79
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 05 October 2010 20:14 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDA13A6C4E for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 13:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.121, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UPc8BBCKzMO0 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 13:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0467D3A6E7B for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 13:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.236.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95KEfVZ014144 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 13:14:47 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1286309688; bh=7Um4mxktdeIVXCUkHDfClgSMbxM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=b2GzJy9IMKLh/B8Rona26FWHOtpuu5rvTUUZOHaUJnI5YX3zJ8SOcv7uIhrJcWJfs mo1c/B4D2uhTtyAUqMrF0NZq90gxlnTjxF4F17MWBAA2VdWEHMTcGZTAJ88T9chUaR ky46aGnBg/fSIH1owuuqTexw/pR3pdBMG11d7/jQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20101005125630.0bc0b3a8@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:57:24 -0700
To: hybi@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [hybi] IETF-79
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:14:13 -0000
Hi Ian, At 10:54 05-10-10, Ian wrote: >SM points out that BOF isn't the right terminology. Apologies. What >I meant was a meeting similar to the one we had at Maastricht a few >months ago. Question still stands :) The working group is not scheduled to meet at IETF 79. Working group participants attending IETF 79 can still make use the opportunity to meet each other and discuss the issues. I listed some of the open issues at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/current/msg04262.html I also commented on the handshake thread. Several participants are still discussing about that and haven't reached a compromise yet. :-) If anyone has any suggestion on how to resolve the issue, it would be most welcome. Regards, S. Moonesamy HyBi WG Secretary
- [hybi] IETF-79 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] IETF-79 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] IETF-79 S Moonesamy