Re: [hybi] deflate-stream and masking

John Tamplin <jat@google.com> Thu, 21 July 2011 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jat@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E948A21F8B08 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.826
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.826 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k8aE3luJRGc4 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF51521F8AF0 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hpaq13.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq13.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.13]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p6L2bbX1015906 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:37:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1311215857; bh=RYXnV5kkYunfpzVf0S6yseZLMEc=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=h58PZoDPBUqd9REX7MNeMfgrTh0q/+G5hGsPerXj3/o77XpT16e4qe8w5MXzh69pW njabJVOuSwgP7dEsf/Rxw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=dkim-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date: message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=StKw0WUKdlvr1sKAI1rMdP+/W4hDoUlcxI8rDAppjMmxsNMBccSVgJiTMR4aB+0VQ Wp8P+0r6YFS5tFyF0p8vA==
Received: from gwj22 (gwj22.prod.google.com [10.200.10.22]) by hpaq13.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p6L2bZRj019298 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:37:36 -0700
Received: by gwj22 with SMTP id 22so857903gwj.7 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=m/F4RkDyZvznN3mnK3wMxkNA048I9exyc6nevFto1s0=; b=OoiEv4RNnhcg5mgO0Q2hY/QGDZCyjqB7B3WBaue/HZRaP6KAYxqaRWUm64oC9D0c2D lsM6rz+jjU5wXzGlWYNw==
Received: by 10.151.88.21 with SMTP id q21mr53042ybl.173.1311215855182; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.49.7 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH_y2NFGCa_r9pJLnjqfZc9QdbZ4=NU-9VQN2G51f7GuDeg8Aw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=UVMAd1nER6mRBe7zoD29CSbCkGA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NFMdr1ZU2dfy9mCRepZc2R_hnzg0oa3kYPKhWY-FX_8Og@mail.gmail.com> <CAE8AN_V-P2L0mVwjPQYxAypJ67=QWKAhWnDqrM_XmDQXjJbEHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP992=HmZM9H2i+rFLVNrJVzfQT2qSPzWRm4gQXc2wTQ8fdBTA@mail.gmail.com> <00b801cc470a$d2d5e520$7881af60$@noemax.com> <CAP992=Gvz7CT=fZSX=t_7J3YAGF7kKsA9a6M0UQJP3HXxMBANQ@mail.gmail.com> <1311190993.1862.135.camel@ds9> <4E273125.8070503@stpeter.im> <CAH_y2NFGCa_r9pJLnjqfZc9QdbZ4=NU-9VQN2G51f7GuDeg8Aw@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:37:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CABLsOLAS+Miue5yG1+KMTRihWmhD7p+rQ0iusMewqm-ZxG4jVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6668a45a31004a88b3b48
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Subject: Re: [hybi] deflate-stream and masking
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 02:37:41 -0000

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

> What I want to know is how (yet again) has a feature with such divided
>
support made it into the spec.  Why does this WG insist on putting non
> consensus features into the spec and then having the argument to
> remove them or not.   The status quo should not be to have a
> non-consensus feature included.    It should be for the proponents of
> a feature to make their case for inclusion and not for the opponents
> to make the case for exclusion.
>

At the time, it wasn't divided.  I don't recall any serious objections at
the time it was proposed and included in the spec, including from you.
 Since then, we added masking which reduces the value in the client->server
direction, but it still has value since most of the large data will be going
from the server to the client.

-- 
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google