IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Comments about draft-13

John Tamplin <jat@google.com> Thu, 08 September 2011 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jat@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF99821F8C65 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6m9Nj0KwZxjO for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2341221F8C45 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.93]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p880g4hA014091 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:42:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1315442525; bh=EYsKId/ZQPeZ9evf8FtsqClJSjQ=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=lATFnCk8WfuA08KgU3XiO9T7uKxifV0RSV8236tBafDhXA+sdvcTsgoatzfoeowoN XrT0wcypm74Tn82DX5Pdw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=dkim-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date: message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=edRpEH/a5EdE6GLpcv+sykbnCbvX1J3S5FL21nyVWe3YCsZW6IyuP4zAwf8wN/3Ue nbCMtNzQXtjR3cLaQ54uA==
Received: from yxj17 (yxj17.prod.google.com [10.190.3.81]) by wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p880fvSn008528 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:42:03 -0700
Received: by yxj17 with SMTP id 17so274969yxj.34 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=QcutGCoBxTHmz3qb4m/YWnvVnvN+rNf1lEwRJ4oUKCc=; b=n7yA3z8yolKa6+aMpe0m4ktnxyrHnVmTP38mI3UgeFwo5fe/Rxnwn5NwKdffmRjk5z F0+zrqsFCBIjBgm8Kglg==
Received: by 10.151.78.16 with SMTP id f16mr240943ybl.116.1315442523374; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.78.16 with SMTP id f16mr240939ybl.116.1315442523143; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.49.7 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH_y2NEg1PigBKxuVZEcdUGGtiLWpDLBcXGVeb_=AMGJY-FYLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfkUMDfuRC+16ZcLo__2OqAcQ1UVDGa_610ykEAe6yZViw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=wO6w5UMLO-hsn8o0cX3__SuxMDrgqvScuS6QWdNhptw@mail.gmail.com> <4E67FD5A.4050308@isode.com> <CAH_y2NEg1PigBKxuVZEcdUGGtiLWpDLBcXGVeb_=AMGJY-FYLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:41:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CABLsOLBaChkOyFG_3Ut8=2M5Og-6qQdPaomaci+wK_Cp-OXsJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd5c0de507daf04ac635452"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Comments about draft-13
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:40:21 -0000

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

> The only thing I think is missing is the ability to speak multiple
> protocols.
>
> The server should be able to say "foo" and "bar" as well as "foo" or "bar"
>
> I don't see any reason that protocols have to be exclusive.  For
> example I might want to use an oauth protocol with a chat protocol.
>

I don't think that makes any sense -- a subprotocol defines the
interpretation of the data that rides in the WS messages.  How can it be
both oauth data and chat data?  It might be an additional layer that can
carry both, but that is the subprotocol that should be negotiated.

-- 
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email