Re: [hybi] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mcmanus-httpbis-h2-websockets-01.txt

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Fri, 27 October 2017 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A624013AD2D for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.734
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.734 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87Ni6euNEtCq for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode64.ducksong.com (linode6only.ducksong.com [IPv6:2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe6e:e8da]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77188139059 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-f41.google.com (mail-lf0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8EDC3A01B for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:25:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-f41.google.com with SMTP id w21so8194220lfc.6 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaW8m6bfR0PK5zZpmt+q498RCcFvg7yxne+eWuTwO8bGQpuIJnXg fSNjfWG3gw+u0b9CJTYDTyK+6GzlD9sDcdoFrH0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SBU30JFv2PmIOdSTzOGMKz8C9DFOSTQLoCEAlyKoyMu81rJ2OPrOy5EjxxwjSmk6sB6zKXX8WeiCON5H6hO54=
X-Received: by 10.46.67.201 with SMTP id z70mr579831lje.124.1509125113524; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.21.22 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVnotgrOBE2o=mi7BxvLEK3MGt_Rr3vmwnLtZ=5VpaOow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150903901882.24232.14013636670744151147.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOdDvNrC1PgribOiDc93hfCDFSJbjodnU8=yeNWgzkq4Cm-2Cg@mail.gmail.com> <CACAJL3nEB5jGFXpqPZ2ErdkezCHpZE1CnqXy0yomBP-v7jcGRA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVnotgrOBE2o=mi7BxvLEK3MGt_Rr3vmwnLtZ=5VpaOow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:25:12 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrc6bK6iTS6seFMof+Gcwmb=k9Qsnz+857wi5yEDPKRdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrc6bK6iTS6seFMof+Gcwmb=k9Qsnz+857wi5yEDPKRdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: John Fallows <john.fallows@kaazing.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, hybi <hybi@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1ab5065039eb055c8a92d8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/HwfK2a2cpObBji7R5uTrGH37tmw>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mcmanus-httpbis-h2-websockets-01.txt
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:25:17 -0000

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>;
wrote:

>
>
> One thing that using :protocol suggests to me is that we need a new status
> code for thi
>

the existing, inherited, CONNECT rule is that 2xx means OK and anything
else means no tunnel. Is defining something better than 501 going to help
the client do something useful?

s, just in case someone asks for an unsupported protocol.  And you probably
> want a registry for :protocol values (yay).
>
>
ha! So I actually re-used the existing Upgrade registry for this. Was that
too rude? I also coming around to naming the pseudo-header :upgrade for
simplicity sake even though its not a great descriptor without a lot of
context.