Re: [hybi] Spec progress vs IETF 78
"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> Mon, 28 June 2010 09:11 UTC
Return-Path: <annevk@opera.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494203A67D9 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.995
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.397, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w1Z+-8keCn-j for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.opera.com (smtp.opera.com [213.236.208.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DA43A687E for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from annevk-t60 (5355737B.cable.casema.nl [83.85.115.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.opera.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id o5S9BDA2017909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:11:29 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
To: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <4C284518.1080509@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:11:14 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Organization: Opera Software ASA
Message-ID: <op.vez6gkxo64w2qv@annevk-t60>
In-Reply-To: <4C284518.1080509@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.60 (Linux)
Subject: Re: [hybi] Spec progress vs IETF 78
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:11:24 -0000
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:45:44 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > If editor bandwidth is the issue, please consider making the XML source > of -00 available, so people can submit patches at least for the > non-controversial issues. The source of the specification is ultimately HTML. (From that XML is generated I believe from which the ID is made.) Specifically: http://svn.whatwg.org/webapps/source -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
- [hybi] Spec progress vs IETF 78 Julian Reschke
- Re: [hybi] Spec progress vs IETF 78 Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [hybi] Spec progress vs IETF 78 SM