IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] consensus call: websocketprotocol baseline

Wellington Fernando de Macedo <wfernandom2004@gmail.com> Wed, 12 May 2010 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wfernandom2004@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB6E28C3E7 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2010 10:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.964
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.964 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.495, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BH6ysTn-U0ai for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2010 10:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94B73A6D78 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 May 2010 10:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwb19 with SMTP id 19so139400gwb.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 May 2010 10:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aahE11dBMj/PweATuPXNE/rrnwYVebxRO/mSUJ3mw6U=; b=bCsX8OjCLJhk2cYH6ma/+Q468wJxnYYfzK9qG9qXf4pUu7TXJoqwwcyuwUDZVl9EGA fb310FmqesUyTTcyOjcWYIwUPd6IshDebCOzxHnao3cZwuAPnrhf8J8ZHDOemL/YUjso /NG3pmSLGddmXvK6EnAyaAY9CPcGDv5Xpgh0E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tY235/qyO48mgwm+/+HNNQoZbKAJ2sZsRar8P1oG6VVCXTxj23SbKxisasWXxF3Jts yEcIoYddR3K7VRnXe7JXZyOukcKpZXZQuvAE2H1pGKBn+lxlL54buGkSguWgq/5m8vaf CpbVLSpAJhoUb6CobdjytAMnZgXIqPPwz0nTg=
Received: by 10.101.11.22 with SMTP id o22mr4533063ani.159.1273684410839; Wed, 12 May 2010 10:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.83] ([200.136.228.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e4sm1006941anb.15.2010.05.12.10.13.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 May 2010 10:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BEAE1B1.60705@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 14:13:21 -0300
From: Wellington Fernando de Macedo <wfernandom2004@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; pt-BR; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hybi@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [hybi] consensus call: websocketprotocol baseline
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 17:36:57 -0000


Wellington, is the version that you've been working on for Firefox based on -75 or -76?  I saw there was a separate bug opened to update to the most recent version of the protocol, didn't know if that was going to be a separate patch or not.
It is based on the 75th. The other bug is intended for updating our 75th implementation to the latest one (I think the 76th one).
Yes, it is going to be a separated patch.


---
Wellington Fernando de Macedo
Computer Engineering
Phone: +55 (16) 8144.8607

Em 12/05/2010 12:28, Christopher Blizzard escreveu:
 On 5/12/2010 4:05 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
Adopting 75 as the baseline will not sort out the mess of deployment
with unversioned different implementations of 75/76 etc.


It was my understanding that the only browser to have shipped this - Chrome - would upgrade once there was a new version available.  It was sadly included in the feature list for the Chrome 5 betas as a feature, but it hasn't seen wide adoption yet.

Wellington, is the version that you've been working on for Firefox based on -75 or -76?  I saw there was a separate bug opened to update to the most recent version of the protocol, didn't know if that was going to be a separate patch or not.

--Chris

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status