Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (5498)
Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Thu, 20 September 2018 12:26 UTC
Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC575130F3C for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=da9+ocT/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=WAbUeZUL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FF-olHp4tqWp for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C57C9130EB7 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F513475; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:26:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:26:08 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=NZL98EESNgjBOxLqdhvGKnjQHIWaP ZM3XWj+7kKxHug=; b=da9+ocT/O9+8a4PNF+WES1WXEBTrnSOdHHtroZn5MmNX5 VaQHZUht7PcZoeEo2gLO4zLpwmeK2+3Owb37eAutETcGnPxTN94zm9dn+oxbklCc w2fLgqaUETweP3xksnRIOx9ocboWh8ll9f0hHQkd/+pS3g5NPCVwZOLkK9PjkwBO ecuu3nbJIA9+n9OMTjaqtSrnqPRz0c9UyCvC9DJsczM+9AfJaZH0CdzMq9jk9YaC Gbhg0j2wF7cWojhX5eBwROilt9EmQCLIs9Tdpm1kfmy2NKCbPiPZC9EjbAwvryba fTzZuYhDflsSVv0OVJYGDavhvVDKXgKQtEK4mn7Lg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=NZL98E ESNgjBOxLqdhvGKnjQHIWaPZM3XWj+7kKxHug=; b=WAbUeZUL1qNC3hLbZwY6so +nLOsSm4BNWrMqZL2B7m18gN8gqh+aqNKcm4N4FwSLOe/1hg1fL61KlmJcQpDFof wdgXgHmHqOBD63LwYnKXxNP4V9/a7oPdp+uAGs24FvvtzzREEK0dSw4udbgaL8rl Y2mSGHT306tLKfGwQsvMp8sNsZ4HtRpAMqRFwlwR7NownNMXNJAfJqR638ex6SfO ydufn5T4WqslcSyVm5M9H21IdftlUK2pdLNIWYP3x7kNOpN0Xc2jw8GTWCmB3ktG TnFshRYCP1mkrWSB+f0fmHoe0zf7OqdqhBgGrToRY1BSC6aVYmkgJIugVWUSou5A ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:35GjW_gNHnpdqdNpx7-mFzD1iIDQIBitNYV_cwJxtA32S4tC3igE8g> <xmx:35GjW8swqH6i_awSbECHHKI6ANKWEYeNXLBMvCovL1aV65RbYJowuw> <xmx:35GjW9T8S1av0DxEgD7IDJ-sb4OwopNC-Z6cxImx_hBv44IJo7qQig> <xmx:35GjWw1-PkHd1Dt_yAVibBP1PLpODm6P9tww7xRBnOBymJGqc3jXJA> <xmx:35GjWyu1sdrOjiHq-KvRI-9MZXXeJJi5tQy3VwU6fv3JjWdHWuCkng> <xmx:4JGjW2K5EJrCC0dSbPzX-y5SMkfUjXeOxnr-HYiL2ggLfnn_HY4YuQ>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:35GjWypAV9o2Y5DycqCik6JhRDM4bq-TtEvXiJa4_WqbdIOJgBjxHQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id EAC8E9E124; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:26:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1537446366.3636997.1514690992.114E0FC0@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: Adam Rice <ricea@google.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ifette+ietf@google.com, Alexey Melnikov <Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com>, ben@nostrum.com, adam@nostrum.com, Salvatore Loreto <Salvatore.Loreto@ericsson.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, hybi@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_153744636636369973"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-e556cd15
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:26:06 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAHixhFon=syYfj4jn5PE9dw4VhkdTjR_j__Gdnf2PqWpm-0iQg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180914145743.55691B80E04@rfc-editor.org> <CAHixhFon=syYfj4jn5PE9dw4VhkdTjR_j__Gdnf2PqWpm-0iQg@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/Ka9ndV6mlq1MqNZ64GyzGCLgRG4>
Subject: Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (5498)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:26:18 -0000
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, at 5:13 AM, Adam Rice wrote: > I think "Name of token" should be "websocket", not "webSocket". You are right, I will correct. > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 08:03, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc- > editor.org> wrote:>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6455, >> "The WebSocket Protocol". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5498 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Registration of Websocket Upgrade token should have >> been websocket <mcmanus@ducksong.com>>> >> Section: 11.2 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> >> Name of token >> WebSocket >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> >> Name of token >> webSocket >> >> Notes >> ----- >> The HTTP bootstrap request is required to use an upgrade token of >> all lowercase "websocket" ->> >> 5. The request MUST contain an |Upgrade| header field whose >> value>> MUST include the "websocket" keyword. >> >> The registration is for "Websocket" (capital W). In practice >> "websocket" is used.>> >> Although the interpretation of that is defined case insensitively >> for this RFC (which conflicts with general HTTP semantics where >> this is case sensitive). As part of RFC 8441, the IANA registry has >> been updated to also include "websocket" with a reference to 6455 >> and 8441>> >> imo this errata should be held for update and the reference to >> "Websocket" removed at that time.>> >> See also https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5453 >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.>> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC6455 (draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-17) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : The WebSocket Protocol >> Publication Date : December 2011 >> Author(s) : I. Fette, A. Melnikov >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : BiDirectional or Server-Initiated HTTP APP >> Area : Applications >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hybi mailing list >> hybi@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
- [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (5498) RFC Errata System
- Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (5… Adam Rice
- Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (5… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [hybi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6455 (5… Patrick McManus