IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes

Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> Wed, 01 December 2010 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <gregw@intalio.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0E73A6C75 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:13:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.294
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.294 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.683, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T1S3x4jtJ3g8 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:13:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314193A6C60 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:13:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so2689790vws.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:14:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.97.68 with SMTP id k4mr7521176qcn.261.1291223691507; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:14:51 -0800 (PST)
Sender: gregw@intalio.com
Received: by 10.220.167.203 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:14:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimwEtKrJm5KxTYZ4wrtONBYDTGjE5LF7__AHBEU@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik0wR-Oag5YJJDmdiSy67WW6TMaHmqWEo4o5kGW@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimwEtKrJm5KxTYZ4wrtONBYDTGjE5LF7__AHBEU@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:14:50 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: nzQ96gjUvqNwCz2syyw_dVwowUs
Message-ID: <AANLkTinTaZr2GS23rXj8F-KESDCwciTR_8KT5n=3p-hn@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>, Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:13:41 -0000

On 1 December 2010 18:00, Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> wrote:
> IMHO, we should adopt the CONNECT handshake first and discuss the
> details of what Host header to send second.

+1

What concerns there are about CONNECT are probably best evaluated with
working code, test deployments and without the distraction of the
debate about bogus host headers.

cheers

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email