Re: [hybi] Call for interest: multiplexing dedicated for WebSocket

Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> Wed, 15 May 2013 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tyoshino@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC6A21F8C69 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 04:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.262
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.262 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.714, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RJha-kv+X7vw for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 04:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB6021F882A for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 04:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id d4so986347eek.14 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 04:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=ZzZ0sqV+svlc/LKXPwSytArKf9nlInwewpIKWNXhJbE=; b=HFq7/NYEnGYgb53xR0ol6abfEiubeYqFo4ta10nFMdRXCalzs5f8538D/pa3CLv8be lqHJtzC/RF6ufMfIDqcHDpSbxivEt1gAJsSBsfq6MqfgN7UVAxEM612P+3G/hA3FI7Gz wfOCMOzk5CV9w3LCMTO04kjj+Tlc2OFMCqFYhzDwz3R82pHCqPCfKGMA0Viu3ZHMhlHt 3ZADSur7ykoX0bY8/Yv815aUNeU46uE5aXDdkYswF64Ff227srcqtlpaqRwHsmfmmjxO f/3BeZHAXOhPi4svFOQ0/SaUMyQEMuFQa2Vz6H6GMRJzYeaQ2ArB6pmsN4B4aBPUBYXD nXZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ZzZ0sqV+svlc/LKXPwSytArKf9nlInwewpIKWNXhJbE=; b=Ja5BhKvPKt3mPluM5FE/zlLiy1KoKPtltTB3vCMigHpFxU7F4FmS2xcHdpzaVYN8cC bZLTlW2Gb3CccZuSzrpAACOhUtHlqiANDR8xNfiv4BN8VQp0UrQd08AL/AwS9u6ozWCv IXpjJN+2Db8J/w1QEI92fe+0WpsB4IhO8wQlSOBtCXeThTsbT6fxmsePOdV/S7Et0Xon SJLzAAoO0lVH+MsG60KENk4PRiVTgHP9NAF5IRiIOBov183Aj73316RmrJBlzsnn+NE8 BN2o5QiwSq/GrWn3ytH4UbhPcXHH9cFslvSjLvZx9e2unYTuwSiQzmnwBGleUVQ7s9eu U4Lw==
X-Received: by 10.14.3.137 with SMTP id 9mr103400298eeh.0.1368619176278; Wed, 15 May 2013 04:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.85.152 with HTTP; Wed, 15 May 2013 04:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH9hSJZxr+aG7GZa4f-dUOTGj4bnJ+3XxivUX4jei5CMyqN4LQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH9hSJZxr+aG7GZa4f-dUOTGj4bnJ+3XxivUX4jei5CMyqN4LQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 20:59:16 +0900
Message-ID: <CAH9hSJZUG1f+3Uk=t2=A5i4O9=wPvAisspM=pgmGEH9emTL9-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6043c8d60ad604dcc07b48"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnbr52CNDdJNb8OhHHEFbN+LG4JHoW81dIOqE8sZUeKr6ka8kqSUlO7RmvS58mruLQYZ6WbVDfDKT63JCzkzbDDdJ7QFBTC1ilD7Yz6U8RfbvlPJLW8gDCWq8LxksTwZoNXhKBnNM8AEy2KdyPQW64gYXx2RRnE+ky5o/XaGLKERXnjoZVHMLtWsb5z0zF3G+E1tw1j
Subject: Re: [hybi] Call for interest: multiplexing dedicated for WebSocket
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 11:59:47 -0000

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>wrote:

> * Concentrate on the best one
>
> Developing and maintaining two different multiplexing code will be burden
> for vendors. It seems that we should stop and think which approach we
> should focus on.
>

I'm not saying we must abandon one of them.

If it turned out both are still considered useful and supported by certain
number of people, we can continue both.