Re: [hybi] consensus call: websocketprotocol baseline

[Jamie Lokier <[e-mail]>]

SM wrote:
> At 07:41 AM 5/7/2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
> >That being said, the *much* more interesting question (to me at 
> >least) is how we manage the process once we have a Working Group draft.
> 
> The usual way.  Changes are proposed on this mailing list and they 
> are incorporated into the I-D if the changes are not 
> controversial.  The editor of the I-D can always ask the WG Chairs 
> for advice if he/she isn't sure about the issue.

Does that mean we know at this point the end product will be whatever
current draft is chosen, plus uncontroversial changes only?

If so at least we know what to expect, and can decide whether to
invest design effort into this protocol or a different one.

Thanks,
-- Jamie