IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Ticket#1 Http Compliance

"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> Thu, 13 May 2010 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <annevk@opera.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F573A6903 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 05:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.115, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gHv3G4d+8UHp for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 05:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.opera.com (smtp.opera.com [213.236.208.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C763A6A02 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 05:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from annevk-t60 (5355737B.cable.casema.nl [83.85.115.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.opera.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id o4DCrZAa006586 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 May 2010 12:53:51 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
To: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
References: <4BEAB021.5030600@webtide.com> <op.vcmr0hge64w2qv@annevk-t60> <4BEBB81F.4010506@webtide.com> <op.vcm3kopz64w2qv@annevk-t60> <4BEBF190.1050301@webtide.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 14:53:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Organization: Opera Software ASA
Message-ID: <op.vcm93lv964w2qv@annevk-t60>
In-Reply-To: <4BEBF190.1050301@webtide.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.54 (Linux)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 213.236.208.81
Subject: Re: [hybi] Ticket#1 Http Compliance
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 12:55:02 -0000

On Thu, 13 May 2010 14:33:20 +0200, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote:
> Is it a requirement to have a requirements document?

I don't know, but in my experience going back to requirements when there  
already is a draft specification is counter-productive. We'll get the same  
debates, only now with more meta. I, for one, am not looking forward to it.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status