Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non-HTTP compliant transparent proxies
"Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com> Thu, 22 July 2010 01:02 UTC
Return-Path: <fielding@gbiv.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DB43A6961 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mKa528mtEXmb for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spaceymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77283A6991 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from di-524.corp.day.com (wsip-98-189-13-228.oc.oc.cox.net [98.189.13.228]) by spaceymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34B480903; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100722003801.GJ14589@shareable.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:02:48 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <76A24DA8-1DA6-487C-8256-5B3BC2688BC8@gbiv.com>
References: <20100721225210.GE6475@1wt.eu> <20100722003801.GJ14589@shareable.org>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non-HTTP compliant transparent proxies
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:02:34 -0000
One cannot send the Upgrade header field without also sending "Connection: Upgrade". The Upgrade header field only applies to the immediate connection. Therefore, the upgrade keyword MUST be supplied within a Connection header field whenever Upgrade is present in an HTTP/1.1 message. ....Roy
- [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non-HTT… Willy Tarreau
- Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non… Willy Tarreau
- Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non… Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non… Willy Tarreau
- Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non… Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non… Willy Tarreau
- Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non… Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non… Willy Tarreau
- Re: [hybi] Proposal for a clean way to detect non… Willy Tarreau