Re: [hybi] WebSocket Version Numbers

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 21 June 2011 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B9511E80C1 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CPBmGZSN3DTz for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BB111E8078 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so2163437qwc.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.17.17 with SMTP id q17mr5106885qca.154.1308663693321; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.181.209 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110621061036.ef1fc80126c74c6c202a919c41c7bb0b.7a63d337a6.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
References: <20110621061036.ef1fc80126c74c6c202a919c41c7bb0b.7a63d337a6.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:41:33 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimWWfsZQqJDaJ3J8PWh+qGDLLktQA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Bob Gezelter <gezelter@rlgsc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] WebSocket Version Numbers
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:41:34 -0000

2011/6/21 Bob Gezelter <gezelter@rlgsc.com>om>:
> I would suggest that the final accepted RFC use a major/minor revision
> scheme of 1.0. A future RFC would have a revision number of 2.0.
> Intermediate drafts would have a minor version increment (e.g., 1.1,
> 1.2, ...).

When you say "a future RFC would have a revision number of 2.0" I hope
you are talking after not less than 10 years ;)

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>