Re: [hybi] Moving to a CONNECT-based handshake

(And for the record, I am happy to put out a revision based on abarth's
proposal. I am also happy to try to re-write it in a format that people find
easier to grok, as opposed to the current handshake's "read 1 byte, call it
X" style. I will probably mess something up in the first attempt at doing
that, and would appreciate people's patience and input in that process.)

-Ian

2010/11/30 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com>

> So, can we make a decision? CCing Joe and Sal, I would like to see a call
> for consensus.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Joe Mason <jmason@rim.com> wrote:
>
>> > As I said, we’re hoping not to have to ship it.  But if the discussion
>> > drags on without producing another candidate for much longer, -00 will
>> > remain the de facto standard, officially obsolete or not.
>>
>> I should also mention, after seeing Adam's paper, we may decide not to
>> throw the switch on -00 after all even if -03+new handshake isn't ready.
>>  But our plan in that case will still be -03+new handshake or nothing.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
>> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
>> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
>> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
>> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
>> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>> _______________________________________________
>> hybi mailing list
>> hybi@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>>
>
>