Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake
Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> Tue, 02 February 2010 17:25 UTC
Return-Path: <justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6EB3A694C for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:25:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.009, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CgdTp+bF0qw6 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:25:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pz0-f183.google.com (mail-pz0-f183.google.com [209.85.222.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A203A67B1 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:25:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pzk13 with SMTP id 13so345877pzk.32 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:26:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cXxisb54KFH+RZkkGnBrkPUq3Gpl34lqdHI1JSN5nLY=; b=u/vfDRy2Wyhz1BBW+0IXnILKJGMNM538nL9TYULNFPo6w+M4uIIP4bFjCxR1zCvlFN OZYTQ+dQaYHhTPtdlanWAtrChVqJasKsqgSLKRIfivW4Fi2fIsOYVfyglQ0JkJrAyCee 8pifYQ3iod1O07SFZLdlRSt3ZTlhGQBuIAWbM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=YV/IrMUVCK9TlbwdeO7DLfnmgz7LEtEgTblYiyvr5bKiGgwvV/0NL8MRgZFYpgLi+5 2rFhqGFMudt0aIZGFpyNK3HiWgpXIno2yocnAaFNULeucoW0k0DNYcosoYPSalKANULV RPPM3M5+0v4bpQm1twiS4ZKFmiEN87m4EEA2g=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com
Received: by 10.142.247.21 with SMTP id u21mr4123638wfh.85.1265131593390; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:26:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0F4875AA-06D6-4181-9019-12E2CDA45DD5@d2dx.com>
References: <0F4875AA-06D6-4181-9019-12E2CDA45DD5@d2dx.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:26:33 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8142004e59307c27
Message-ID: <5c902b9e1002020926j4d1d26f5xc9b673b9e5033685@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>
To: Vladimir Katardjiev <vladimir@d2dx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:25:58 -0000
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Vladimir Katardjiev <vladimir@d2dx.com> wrote: > [1] I hold that the exact header ordering is a _probability_ but not _guarantee_ that WebSockets breaks on HTTP proxies. The rationale is that for any sorting algorithm on headers there must be a set of input values that ensures the output happens to come in the correct order. I, unfortunately, have no proof of this statement, hence footnote status. When using mod_proxy, httpd will generally re-order headers as it sees fits. (BTW, thanks for chiming in!) -- justin
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Justin Erenkrantz
- [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Vladimir Katardjiev
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Francis Brosnan Blázquez
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Roberto Peon
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Lars Eggert
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake Martin J. Dürst