IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Reliable message delivery (was Re: Technical feedback.)

Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es> Tue, 02 February 2010 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <francis@aspl.es>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E8B3A65A6 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:25:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.631
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.348, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP=1.889, HOST_EQ_STATIC=1.172, HOST_EQ_STATICIP=1.511, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O4hl3T0HTOoI for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:25:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.aspl.es (196.Red-212-170-101.staticIP.rima-tde.net [212.170.101.196]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5313A6888 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:25:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aspl.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643D11170005; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:25:56 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at aspl.es
Received: from mail.aspl.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dolphin.aspl.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pku2ggEGINSB; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:25:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.132] (barracuda [10.0.0.4]) by mail.aspl.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EE41170001; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:25:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B676FCA.9070506@webtide.com>
References: <4B62C5FE.8090904@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4B62E516.2010003@webtide.com> <5c902b9e1001290756r3f585204h32cacd6e64fbebaa@mail.gmail.com> <4B636757.3040307@webtide.com> <8449BE19-3061-4512-B563-02973FBB707B@apple.com> <5c902b9e1001292310l5442d476n8375139f3480671b@mail.gmail.com> <26D406E7-2319-476E-9ADF-80D84200C270@apple.com> <5c902b9e1001292333k79569316lf371938c9aa766@mail.gmail.com> <128BFD31-9835-47B1-B7A9-F20F5CDA8D8C@apple.com> <20100130144936.GD19124@shareable.org> <5c902b9e1001301552n6efb7969o34110373e3ab4945@mail.gmail.com> <4B672C9D.9010205@ericsson.com> <op.u7gy9bag64w2qv@annevk-t60> <4B675CA6.2070406@webtide.com> <op.u7g04dun64w2qv@annevk-t60> <4B676ABE.9060901@webtide.com> <op.u7g30dfu64w2qv@annevk-t60> <4B676FCA.9070506@webtide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: ASPL
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:25:55 +0100
Message-Id: <1265135155.4450.556.camel@vulcan.aspl.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Reliable message delivery (was Re: Technical feedback.)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:25:24 -0000

Hi Greg,

> TCP does have  difference between an orderly shutdown (FIN),
> error shutdown (RST) and timeouts.
> 
> So if you want to be like TCP, then you'll have those
> concepts.

Why not?

I think people is interested on Websocket because they will layer its
favourite protocol on top of it. I not stating I'm against this but I
still don't see this point and how it would improve the protocol...

In other words, people that cares about orderly close will use a
protocol on top of Websocket that provides graceful close (like BEEP)
and people that do not cares about this will have an additional feature
not requested....so it looks to me both kind of users won't use this. 
-- 
Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es>
ASPL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email