[hybi] WebSockets protocol URI scheme names
Graham Klyne <gk-ietf-hybi@ninebynine.org> Mon, 26 October 2009 11:39 UTC
Return-Path: <gk-ietf-hybi@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62013A68EE for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.902, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aoBV1hrWTjoo for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay6.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay6.mail.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.167]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACE03A685B for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.205]) by relay6.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <gk-ietf-hybi@ninebynine.org>) id 1N2Nvf-0006nF-Lr for hybi@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:40:03 +0000
Received: from gklyne.plus.com ([80.229.154.156] helo=Eskarina.local) by smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <gk-ietf-hybi@ninebynine.org>) id 1N2Nvf-0007H8-7x for hybi@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:40:03 +0000
Message-ID: <4AE587E5.6070704@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:28:37 +0000
From: Graham Klyne <gk-ietf-hybi@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Subject: [hybi] WebSockets protocol URI scheme names
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:39:51 -0000
Some time ago, there was some discussion about the URI scheme name for WebSockets (ws:/wss:). As scheme registration reviewer, I recommended holding off registration while that debate was ongoing. That debate seems to have run its course - would it be fair to say that rough consensus is that the scheme names will likely be as originally proposed? #g
- [hybi] WebSockets protocol URI scheme names Graham Klyne
- Re: [hybi] WebSockets protocol URI scheme names Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] WebSockets protocol URI scheme names Mark Nottingham
- Re: [hybi] WebSockets protocol URI scheme names Mark Nottingham