Re: [hybi] WebSocket & Nagle
"Pat McManus @Mozilla" <mcmanus@ducksong.com> Fri, 18 March 2011 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958B13A6926 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aImEvCAY5aFw for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode.ducksong.com (linode.ducksong.com [64.22.125.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B753A691D for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by linode.ducksong.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 71540102A7; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:51:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.16.226] (cpe-67-253-92-25.maine.res.rr.com [67.253.92.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linode.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31F7110159; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:51:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Pat McManus @Mozilla" <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
To: Greg Longtin <Greg@ChampionEnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <000501cbe59a$62701cf0$275056d0$@net>
References: <000501cbe59a$62701cf0$275056d0$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:50:11 -0400
Message-ID: <1300477811.2965.2278.camel@ds9.ducksong.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] WebSocket & Nagle
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:50:01 -0000
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 13:29 -0500, Greg Longtin wrote: > To all, > > I have been working with WebSocket, based on it being a browser based socket > interface for intranet use. > > I've created a Windows server, and have been testing with the MSFT 05 and 06 > Silverlight prototypes and Pat McManus' WS 06 Minefield build (thank you.) > its true the minefield build had nagle enabled because it only had the websocket patch included.. but in our patch tracker the websockets patch already depends on another one that disables nagle - so a real build won't go out the door without it. though as gabriel notes there are certainly some applications (e.g. one keystroke per msg) that should work the other way and I'd be happy with an API to address it. -- http://www.getfirefox.com/
- [hybi] WebSocket & Nagle Greg Longtin
- Re: [hybi] WebSocket & Nagle Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
- Re: [hybi] WebSocket & Nagle Andy Green
- Re: [hybi] WebSocket & Nagle Gabriel Montenegro
- Re: [hybi] WebSocket & Nagle Pat McManus @Mozilla