Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Fri, 02 September 2011 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B0421F8FB4; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.643
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.643 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FZghxPCQcjpZ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBEE21F8E27; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so657453qyk.10 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.2.23 with SMTP id 23mr613420qch.253.1314958190458; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.79.207 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 03:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E60A783.1090209@gmail.com>
References: <20110711140229.17432.23519.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5355F3EF-DD59-4D3C-9578-84043A3B8E90@gbiv.com> <4E60A783.1090209@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:09:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfnnf=rvftRLAJD=rjRs4VxZhtCOKHSt6niDb14m3tMy5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Hector <sant9442@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org, iesg@iesg.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:08:17 -0000

2011/9/2 Hector <sant9442@gmail.com>:
> Doesn't a WEBSOCKET client required a backend WEBSOCKET server to do
> handshaking and authentication to even allow it in the first so?  If so,
> whose network management constraint is it bypassing?

I suppose Roy talks about company firewalls or HTTP proxies inspecting
HTTP traffic nature.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>