IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] [dispatch] Publication request for draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk-00

Adam Rice <ricea@google.com> Fri, 23 June 2017 10:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ricea@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B5D1274D0 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 03:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWuJ3TG5Vgzd for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 03:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x231.google.com (mail-wr0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F56128B8D for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 03:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x231.google.com with SMTP id k67so59432349wrc.2 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 03:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eANuT5PwY6b1sXp9p1mqXRdIDkgWa91Q6z53UN3EK1Q=; b=VyG7EBCNdLi7HFAHa9p2N9t14g8opLAeJ2lmWkfMTHCpM3gS4m8UzktBmc9Dy6aRV8 gXMc0dneduLXYmVOBboGkFW0Ph7ZM/du9PlbcFrDz5FTY0ArzQT3avIB32eBruxmQM9K aQOfqn2JrKTiNzCav7NwwhurSZNiz2FgeFsFD0AsAJEFQVW0yCrjAnbMq2hLzb4aLuDe 0c4Ds7AH3hLN93vyRI5uXtcuucoL9h90q9vuwCNGPTaYTr+hZbZdmfw+k9AT73TjuIgq 6ue/+J9RMW37igQ4eRKFAMCUx3isCBYX8Y61BELmthi/nQ44o2Uag8IjkRluOSHscs36 nGlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eANuT5PwY6b1sXp9p1mqXRdIDkgWa91Q6z53UN3EK1Q=; b=itWQ5UvC7nL4v1PX9i0dsq7Cw6GPFLjuKjYfZlWA2VetGBY25FXZDgTOHeij1cKqCE gBAA/s7Iz4MCFnH3HOTAIZWjjEOrvhesmD8K3aXNWfFXS1pL4+klT0LJSynfbjwDDSJs YagW74fUSPcu2itcpP50OHeB3THD7yOtTrt1gTsknKgoFuE9IdfySPOxxGTH0Ja3y+51 B0sUuTLETtf4CcS3fgrFuJ2Oe/F4bS7mMrhjyBNPyd1F0WjmDRxiQLmmJ9DqvKskr09a 3zzcpYTH3IimrUzAq8S6LN9OnxeUcXx6+vZGvppMVAimRX47rQ1yU0MCNgeMW9czuIr+ v9WA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxgoiqObByQMZZME8ETxFTg9uJEyP2kyxcSenlZVlCloJcjlUfR zDYxRXH9MFYXHQu56Lnsgv2Xl9jUdvbJ
X-Received: by 10.28.229.6 with SMTP id c6mr4939229wmh.49.1498214113734; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 03:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.218.3 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 03:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADnb78gy2C5Lk4RWEkTS4ew_wvOx6vEwV_pNWQkGjYrpxbH19A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <594A9557.9080707@isode.com> <CADnb78i6wHw+u-Y5JfGpNuODxx30kUB8mcWuK1VDDL6VBTiQ1w@mail.gmail.com> <1498149228.3653703.1018087584.5D4E9087@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CADnb78gy2C5Lk4RWEkTS4ew_wvOx6vEwV_pNWQkGjYrpxbH19A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Rice <ricea@google.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:35:12 +0900
Message-ID: <CAHixhFrrVoLAp5YPR8SvvdnH0za-VHasmtjqwjZc4ba2yf8Ysw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, dispatch@ietf.org, "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1145b51a0c758205529e281b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/PiMcGTRwXh9ERJvfrPGH5IfD0Mw>
Subject: Re: [hybi] [dispatch] Publication request for draft-bormann-hybi-ws-wk-00
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:35:19 -0000

On 23 June 2017 at 03:13, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> The /.well-known/ thing only makes sense with respect to the WebSocket
> handshake, no? And that's already defined to be an HTTP request. So
> I'm not sure why any /.well-known/ things with regard to HTTP would
> not already apply. (One of the reasons Fetch made this
> change/clarification is to make sure HSTS, CSP, etc. would all apply
> to WebSocket as well.)
>

If understand correctly, this permits a well-known WebSocket endpoint to be
registered under /.well-known/, so it's not just about HTTP-compatibility.

I don't see any problems with the proposal, as long as it's actually going
to be used. Is there a list of expected use-cases somewhere?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email