IETF Logo Mail Archive

[hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 15 April 2010 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4DA3A67CF for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.984, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id II1j3JpVDivH for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F3993A6B4D for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2010 09:34:08 -0000
Received: from p508FCE13.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.206.19] by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 11:34:08 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+kVOsIr46kdPALTlQJxXzyxNSnm6Pa6Mim8h1LyO wzowAxxD1Z82Aa
Message-ID: <4BC6DD89.4060502@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:34:01 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pieter Hintjens <ph@imatix.com>
References: <B578CFED7FE85644A170F4F7C9D52692019544C5@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se> <3d5f2a811003150230sdeb4f78hbdece96e5c742cfc@mail.gmail.com> <de17d48e1003180316w3dda1a3fo7db8b357925ec3f8@mail.gmail.com> <p2o3d5f2a811003310031x5dce7e9cs86a5a8981cd23c1d@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004140032040.875@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <w2y5821ea241004142323h949c0b07l771171500a625a6c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <w2y5821ea241004142323h949c0b07l771171500a625a6c@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.67000000000000004
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:34:20 -0000

On 15.04.2010 08:23, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> tl;dr
> ...

Not helpful; both you quoting all of this and adding a single comment 
(as far as I can tell), and the original mega mail as well.

Aggregating multiple things into one email can be good, but aggregating 
*everything* that was collected over several weeks into a single mail 
clearly is not.

Can we please try to find a good balance, in particular with mail 
threads where the subject line gives some indication about what 
something is about?

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email