IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] WebSocket feedback

Mridul Muralidharan <mridulm80@yahoo.com> Fri, 05 March 2010 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mridulm80@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EF628C133 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:27:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fjSQYuiRc3-2 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:27:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web95405.mail.in2.yahoo.com (web95405.mail.in2.yahoo.com [203.104.18.229]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E4C5128C36A for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 50711 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Mar 2010 22:27:03 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1267828023; bh=A0LdTS0WBQK/VfUqsNtwnKISdU2CEHtsyPaIIbO11Sg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CsLIC3qqtqyEYiNvT3Lgmc3jpq83mQJiw3Ye+O9yJOEyV8LUvQFP8fx6GSJCNP6gyPNJVDpkgGUKvZPfHS34VQzeoozOmJsXbjvatRId7aMeg1vtciKMYY9P1fZJThmzQIFVR71sp+OFogQQ6mC6/u9Kd/IIKIb1J7CdGAUgzEs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=zWM83DDMcYXCOzfEYzyfDCqszcvNwIwJJw/LlQDpj9SCNUFGjS50nX/3ppaOwk+pz4KItlW+PUo/AmLZkstKsRcGGERL22cOKZWMHHoRpqVu7GqqDiJ2bM1ME2ldtpONHvIgPjbBgY/mVWrP9VhNnD2V+ycLTEk1DJ3TJv4pU3A=;
Message-ID: <274140.50246.qm@web95405.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: VOPmUx4VM1lHlxcJfNggJ9atYropQE7EbW3JMJSJ5qZN2dUqJLdWWxXEhK_pEYHAiOlC4RbUwVB7uV03wDsIrXglruOYaRW3Bd2lV94yU0M0atbSpuG6_nsiLcxhrL5nSAmsdoM.6Th3y642L2fkUWpOYEF58oame2l_rw9pLx29GtwreZMvpvx_qdgnjobRMhUOOTU84mk9SWFyHk6xhiMp2RybtaVcXxkIkoWHLkvbP3S6TTr_FBVhxWzOKfBJFJ7_vPrF6PapDbdSury.5RdlZ9XJGoj_nW8yjTZnpBQWhw--
Received: from [122.167.78.252] by web95405.mail.in2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:57:03 IST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/300.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
References: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F032E566DDF@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002150605580.29686@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4B8F6056.8060809@webtide.com> <CE4EF44A-6C8F-43BC-ABF4-777C1149A16F@d2dx.com> <4B8F72FA.2050908@webtide.com> <4B90D3B2.8070502@ninebynine.org> <4B915EA1.2030701@webtide.com> <4B9160D5.8020907@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:57:03 +0530
From: Mridul Muralidharan <mridulm80@yahoo.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B9160D5.8020907@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] WebSocket feedback
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:27:06 -0000

This is very interesting !
Thanks for clarifying.

Regards,
Mridul




----- Original Message ----
> From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
> Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>; Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
> Sent: Sat, 6 March, 2010 1:21:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [hybi] WebSocket feedback
> 
> On 05.03.2010 20:42, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> > Graham,
> >
> > it is my experience that GETs with bodies transit the internet without
> > problem - which is as the spec says they should.
> >
> > But I agree that having a GET with a body can stretch the semantics
> > of the method.  For this reason and for avoiding auto retries, I think
> > POST would be a better method.
> > ...
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi



      The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email