IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Sec-WebSocket-Protocl

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 21 June 2011 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E536611E80C1 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mw2xHjpFu4dn for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFB911E8083 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so2524569qyk.10 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.17.17 with SMTP id q17mr5082459qca.154.1308662386796; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.181.209 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E00985E.9060301@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimduZjX6YG+X23yOvwxk5CwWW6=uRexcPjhHEUkLkwu2w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=ajW-bkr7OuXWhU12qSHs7m4hFzQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=igdtepNewwhk6F_Hro740Ye0ztbZzAGLgYL5NoWg1AQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=MzK_L1UZY1B3twP5pENbnAsgL-Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E00985E.9060301@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:19:46 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimzZ5psGpn0MwWJr2pqoTfrFmYzjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Philipp Serafin <phil127@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Sec-WebSocket-Protocl
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:19:48 -0000

2011/6/21 Philipp Serafin <phil127@gmail.com>:
> I believe there are strong use-cases for both using WS with sub
> protocols and without, so both should be possible.

Then the spec should improve *a lot* the usage case of the
Sec-WebSocket-Subprotocol header (i.e. what happens when the HTTP
handshake request does not contain such a header?).

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email