Re: [hybi] IESG note?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard

Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh@defuze.org> Sun, 04 September 2011 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <sh@defuze.org>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2C821F8801; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 19:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.845
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.131, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1r7UbK2QA4BP; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 19:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AED21F85F6; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 19:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iakc1 with SMTP id c1so5841412iak.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.20.197 with SMTP id p5mr1986608pbe.284.1315102052205; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.113.8 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 19:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [82.229.61.197]
In-Reply-To: <CAO228Nv=vRy=m=_hxjL=Lrndd43ykPjgcCSX7MuHYKNM8CstYw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110711140229.17432.23519.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5355F3EF-DD59-4D3C-9578-84043A3B8E90@gbiv.com> <4E620772.9090900@gmx.de> <4E6228F9.2030108@gmx.de> <20110903194323.GA19164@1wt.eu> <CAO228Nv=vRy=m=_hxjL=Lrndd43ykPjgcCSX7MuHYKNM8CstYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 04:07:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CALkdAkhGyDy7N+GaDyD2rnaqtG7Tg2tpaqtVy3PB=VN9mCuUuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh@defuze.org>
To: Joel Martin <hybi@martintribe.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5215a9baa432d04ac140e84
Cc: iesg@iesg.org, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] IESG note?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:05:56 -0000

>
>
>>
> +1. I like that phrasing. It summarizes the requirements document pretty
> well
>


Yet it never was worded that way when this WG started debating mainly WS. In
fact, I don't recall any other protocol being discussed on this board so I
disagree with the term "requirement" in this very case.


-- 
- Sylvain
http://www.defuze.org
http://twitter.com/lawouach