Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Mon, 25 July 2011 05:01 UTC

Return-Path: <w@1wt.eu>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B0E21F84CD; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.413, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_IS_SMALL6=0.556]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bp7HryQQygv2; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1wt.eu (1wt.eu [62.212.114.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8D821F84C9; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6P511in028449; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:01:01 +0200
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:01:01 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Message-ID: <20110725050101.GO22405@1wt.eu>
References: <20110722054345.GE18126@1wt.eu> <9031.1311500145.687172@puncture> <20110724105223.GL22405@1wt.eu> <CALiegfkTVg2=k4d8rxmpqXmaRUihRmhtgfF4QRUTAKic7gBk5w@mail.gmail.com> <20110724121147.GR22405@1wt.eu> <CALiegf=GDDKdXOXgz3oognh6=qRDKFUSrRfLOtOoUucAxr4p3w@mail.gmail.com> <20110724183343.GY22405@1wt.eu> <20110725004658.A3AE71221C03@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20110725042921.GJ22405@1wt.eu> <20110725045038.0EDEE122303F@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110725045038.0EDEE122303F@drugs.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 05:01:08 -0000

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 02:50:37PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> 
> In message <20110725042921.GJ22405@1wt.eu>eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:46:58AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > Adding a SRV lookup should add 0ms if it isn't there as you should be
> > > making A, AAAA and SRV lookups in parallel.
> > 
> > This does not work for a simple reason : you have to perform the lookups
> > on the SRV response just as you would do with a CNAME :
> 
> Please re-read my claim as your comment is not applicable to it.

Ah OK : "if it isn't there". Sorry for missing it.

Willy